Hi
grsec 2.1.7 is currently available for 2.6.13.4 so i decided to
rework
"http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/hlfs/svn/linux-2.6.11.12-pseudo_random-1.patch";
for apllication on the same kernelversion. just some replacements
and renaming some functions for device creation/registration.
in .
Jim Gifford wrote:
We have ran into a issue of it failing on Solaris, that's the reason for
the patch.
Ah, so it's a patch specific to /tools (or cross-lfs equivalent). In
that case, it's obviously fine for cross-lfs, though I'll leave it out
of LFS as it doesn't affect us (at least I know o
We have ran into a issue of it failing on Solaris, that's the reason for
the patch.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See th
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The question is whether "both" or "none" is the correct answer. AFAIK
there are no hosts in the real world that don't understand "tail -1",
and the new version of coreutils says that disallowing this syntax was a
mistake.
And that's my understanding too. I shoul
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Howdy.
Matt, we have a release date in mind? Have people been testing the 6.1.1
build? Manuel, you have it buildable via jhalfs, right? Have you seen good
results with that?
Bug http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1642 is not fixed.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Howdy.
Have people been testing the 6.1.1 build?
I built it[1], and my full desktop from the LFS-6.1 era, on my test
machine (from an LFS svn host running gcc-4). That is, X-6.8.2,
graphics libs and toolkits, gcc-3.3.5, firefox (forgot to upgrad
Howdy.
Matt, we have a release date in mind? Have people been testing the 6.1.1
build? Manuel, you have it buildable via jhalfs, right? Have you seen good
results with that?
Just don't want this one to be dropped. :) I think we need a quick release
on this. (Then the LiveCD team can build and rel
Hello,
the patch named binutils-2.16.1-posix-1.patch is currently used in
cross-LFS, but not in the regular LFS. It fixes some calls to "head" and
"tail", for POSIX compliance. It has nothing to do with
cross-compilation techniques and thus has to be present either in both
cross and non-cross
