Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
I suppose the 20 line scan.l hunk in it is redundant, though it's not
going to save that much space in the grand scheme of things.
It won't save space, but removing that file from the patch will prevent
scan.c from being rebuilt. Which was (part of
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I suppose the 20 line scan.l hunk in it is redundant, though it's not
> going to save that much space in the grand scheme of things.
It won't save space, but removing that file from the patch will prevent
scan.c from being rebuilt. Which was (part of) the whole point.
;-
David Jensen wrote:
Wait, there is more in the -4.patch than needed. So it's not that bad,
skel.c and scan.c patch is only 152K, and parts of them are already
included. Still large though.
Yeah, I've uploaded a 157K patch at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~matthew/flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes
David Jensen wrote:
Yes, but it is huge, see the size of the
flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-4.patch, it is all in there. 924K.
It seems easier, perhaps 'more pure' to regenerate locally.
Wait, there is more in the -4.patch than needed. So it's not that bad,
skel.c and scan.c patch is only 152K, an
Matthew Burgess wrote:
David Jensen wrote:
1. The order of the files in flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-2.patch may
sometimes trigger regenerating scan.c, which causes the build to fail
if flex is not already installed.
-- Solution: Move the scan.c section of the patch to after the
scan.l section
Jim Gifford wrote:
Does the problem occur with the -4 patch I posted a while back??
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/flex/flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-4.patch
Yes, visual inspection shows the scan.c hunk will be applied before the
scan.l hunk
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.
Does the problem occur with the -4 patch I posted a while back??
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/flex/flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-4.patch
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
David Jensen wrote:
1. The order of the files in flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-2.patch may
sometimes trigger regenerating scan.c, which causes the build to fail if
flex is not already installed.
-- Solution: Move the scan.c section of the patch to after the scan.l
section. Build and install per t
