Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20050428
Chapter 5. Constructing a Temporary System
5.15. Coreutils-5.2.1
make RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes check.
NOTE: This command is all Bold, including
the period. If you include the period then
it does not belong inside the XML tag(?)
as it is not part of the c
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> So, with all that said, I think someone with some time on their hands
> needs to investigate this whole 'dev.d' setup (or just hit me with
> the relevant cluebat), and we'll put the relevant machinery in the
> bootscripts and/or the book. This, I believe, would completely
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 07:23:07AM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
>
> It depends on your setup, we would have to create a netboot floppy. Take
> a look at http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Gentoo_Diskless_Install
That fact that it does depend on your setup, and that it requires
physical access makes this
Matthew Burgess wrote:
I think that the top two were failing because the relevant
/proc entries hadn't been created
Well, I don't get the error here anymore, so I can only assume it was
operator error when I was first playing with this. That said, I don't
think moving sysctl to S01 is particular
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 16:23, Jim Gifford escribió:
> It depends on your setup, we would have to create a netboot floppy. Take
> a look at http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Gentoo_Diskless_Install
From that page:
"Booting the client
Now, just boot the client. Configure the bios and the netwo
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 07:36, Jim Gifford escribió:
My idea is the netboot thing. Since all the bootloaders in question will
work with NFS or TFTP booting.
Could you explain that in detail?
I'm not sure but IMHO, to can boot from net the BIOS must be configured fi
On Sat, 14 May 2005, M.Canales.es wrote:
>
> Don't miss the point of this thread: Is there realy some case where you must
> to build the packages up to "reboot" in one machine (the HOST) and then to
> copy that temp system to other machine (the TARGET) to build the final
> system?
>
Ah, I misund
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 15:43, Ken Moffat escribió:
>
> I think I've got a third - machines that can run a 32-bit or a 64-bit
> system (i.e. x86_64 or ppc64) that are currently running 32-bit (i686 or
> ppc). It's easy enough to install current 32-bit LFS on them, upgrading
> to multilib s
On Sat, 14 May 2005, M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 01:42, Archaic escribió:
>
> Lastly, IMHO the combo HOST != TARGET only is usefull in two cases:
>
> To build a full system (with X, servers, etc...) in a fast machine that will
> be later instaled in a slow machine.
>
> Or t
Let's face it, Age should be nothing more than a number
It's okay to want to hold on to your young body as long as you can
With increasing longevity for an increasing segment of the population,
this is THE frontier for the new millennium-Dr Virgil Howard
http://mksk.Kf.optimalsupervise.com/s/
Vi
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 07:36, Jim Gifford escribió:
> My idea is the netboot thing. Since all the bootloaders in question will
> work with NFS or TFTP booting.
Could you explain that in detail?
I'm not sure but IMHO, to can boot from net the BIOS must be configured first
to allow it, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
