Re: Please confirm your request to join CHETANA-JOBS

2005-05-08 Thread Archaic
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:05:18AM -, Yahoo!Groups wrote: > > We have received your request to join the CHETANA-JOBS Wasn't this specific yahoo group blocked a long time ago? -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://ww

Please confirm your request to join CHETANA-JOBS

2005-05-08 Thread Yahoo!Groups
Hello lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org, We have received your request to join the CHETANA-JOBS group hosted by Yahoo! Groups, a free, easy-to-use community service. This request will expire in 7 days. TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE GROUP: 1) Go to the Yahoo! Groups site by clicking on this link:

LFS SVN-20050428: udev-0.57 TEST 104 failure

2005-05-08 Thread Sébastien Vajda
Using LFS SVN-20050428 with following deviation: binutils 2.16 instead of 2.15.94.0.2.2 make test of udev 0.57 fails on TEST 104 with following error message: Can't exec "tree": No such file or directory at ./udev-test.pl line 1462. Don't we need something like tree at http://mama.indstate.edu/

Re: Multi-arch/Cross-lfs discussion -- Book Structuring

2005-05-08 Thread DJ Lucas
Jim Gifford wrote: > We have been talking about different formats for the different books, I > was thinking and wondering if it was possible to do the following. > > 1 - On our other architecture where things are the same no change > needed. these would be placed in /common directory. > 2 - On the

Re: lfs & ppc

2005-05-08 Thread Archaic
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:05:59PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > /me dons his FedEx suit, infiltrates the system and intercepts the package. Take Nathan's, instead. His is more brightly polished. :P -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux

Re: lfs & ppc

2005-05-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Archaic wrote: On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Andreas Fehr wrote: LFS works now on my mac mini (including network), That's good to hear since I have one en route via FedEx right now. :) /me dons his FedEx suit, infiltrates the system and intercepts the package. I now control the horizo

Re: lfs & ppc

2005-05-08 Thread Archaic
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Andreas Fehr wrote: > > LFS works now on my mac mini (including network), That's good to hear since I have one en route via FedEx right now. :) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch ht

Multi-arch/Cross-lfs discussion -- Book Structuring

2005-05-08 Thread Jim Gifford
We have been talking about different formats for the different books, I was thinking and wondering if it was possible to do the following. 1 - On our other architecture where things are the same no change needed. these would be placed in /common directory. 2 - On the differences, couldn't we cal

Re: binutils-2.16

2005-05-08 Thread Robert Connolly
On May 8, 2005 09:17 am, Archaic wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:16:24AM -0400, Robert Connolly wrote: > > FSF binutils-2.16 looks like its alright, at least for x86. I assume we > > can switch to this? The patches are no problem, the uclibc one is already > > made, the pt_pax one only has 1 re

Re: testsuites

2005-05-08 Thread Robert Connolly
On May 8, 2005 09:15 am, Archaic wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:28:38AM -0400, Robert Connolly wrote: > > I have been able to rebuild glibc and uclibc hlfs systems with the > > grsecurity kernel, but the testsuites have issues. Both glibc and > > binutils tests will fail for various reasons..

Re: Copyright policy on patches

2005-05-08 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Could someone throw me a cluebat here? I've found a patch that is needed > for the sparc architecture and kbd-1.12 (Build fails with: > kbdrate.c:167: error: structure has no member named `period') > > The patch I've found is placed under two licenses i

Copyright policy on patches

2005-05-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Could someone throw me a cluebat here? I've found a patch that is needed for the sparc architecture and kbd-1.12 (Build fails with: kbdrate.c:167: error: structure has no member named `period') The patch I've found is placed under two licenses it seems. How do we usually handle something like th

Re: LFS Editor's Manual

2005-05-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: None at all, it's been on my TODO for ages, so I'd be glad for anyone to commit anything to it at the moment :) Ok. I've updated text in the first five chapters, added a changelog, etc. You've probably seen most of the edits as I've committed them. ;) I'm sure there's a lo

Results for 3.4.3 testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

2005-05-08 Thread Peter Ennis
Host: Fedora Core 4 Test 1 with latest updates binutils-2.16.90.0.2 Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20050428 Chapter 5. Constructing a Temporary System 5.12. GCC-3.4.3 - Pass 2 NOTE: "For an example of how current GCC-3.4.3 should look on i686-pc-linux-gnu, see http://gcc

Re: Cross-LFS 64-bit decisions

2005-05-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Ryan Oliver wrote: Best stay /lib /lib64, trust me... I'm still working on hackery for gcc to provide the other if so desired but it is not that high on my agenda as of yet... Plus, if you go the other way, expect pain with pre-compiled stuff such as Nvidia drivers, and you have to hack X which def

Re: lfs & ppc

2005-05-08 Thread Andreas Fehr
On Sun, 8 May 2005, 10:15, Jeremy Huntwork (as JH) wrote: > JH: Thanks Andreas for those notes. To be honest, I don't know if > JH: anyone had actually built an LFS system by following that book > JH: yet. Thanks for testing it out for us! ;) I had always built my > JH: ppc machine by just foll

Re: lfs & ppc

2005-05-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Andreas Fehr wrote: [snip a list of good catches] Thanks Andreas for those notes. To be honest, I don't know if anyone had actually built an LFS system by following that book yet. Thanks for testing it out for us! ;) I had always built my ppc machine by just following the x86 book and adjusting

Re: lfs & ppc

2005-05-08 Thread Andreas Fehr
On Sat, 7 May 2005, 08:24, Andreas Fehr (as AF) wrote: >AF: > JH: Although it's not 100% complete, and may contain a few bugs, >AF: > JH: there's a multi-arch LFS book under development with a ppc >AF: > JH: section. It might be a good reference for you: >AF: > JH: >AF: > JH: http://documents.

Re: lfs & ppc

2005-05-08 Thread Andreas Fehr
On Sat, 7 May 2005, 09:52, Jeremy Huntwork (as JH) wrote: > JH: Andreas Fehr wrote: > JH: > > JH: > I guess, this list is as good as any other place. > JH: > JH: Actually, the lfs-dev list is where development topics go, so book > JH: fixes should be noted there. This list is for support. :) CC

RE: lfs-bootscripts (networking)

2005-05-08 Thread Emmanuel Chriqui
> >> > >> I'm confused, or your using terminology I'm not understanding - by > >> definition, a default gateway is where I send packets that I don't > > know > >> how > >> to route - and therefore there can only be one "default gateway". > > Perhaps > >> you meant multiple routes between networks,