Re: Localnet bootscript

2005-04-14 Thread Archaic
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: > I recently built a version of 6.1 testing and when I rebooted into it I got > a Fail for the localnet bootscript. The error message was I do not doubt the fix but am puzzled by why this error is not noticed by others. Could there be

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-14 Thread Archaic
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 02:23:48PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > ERASECHAR 010 Mine is 0177. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs

SBU timings

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Attached are timings from my recent build logs. -- Bruce Title Seconds SBU Binutils reference130.41.0 OpenSP-1.5.1127.91.0 Python-2.4.1121.10.9 alsa-lib-1.0.80.20.0 alsa-lib-1.0.8

SBU Timings

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
The attached are my timings from my recent build. -- Bruce Program Secs SBU binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2 130.4 1.0 timing Separate timing run from hard disk to offset Live-CS delays Chapter 5 adjust-toolchain 3.4

Re: Localnet bootscript

2005-04-14 Thread Nathan Coulson
On 4/14/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nathan Coulson wrote: > > > Anyone know why I shouldn't commit this? > > I don't see why not, though I'm not seeing any problems. Is this a > timing issue? Obviously this will break the usual rule of not upgrading > packages during the re

Re: Localnet bootscript

2005-04-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
Nathan Coulson wrote: Anyone know why I shouldn't commit this? I don't see why not, though I'm not seeing any problems. Is this a timing issue? Obviously this will break the usual rule of not upgrading packages during the release process, unless we just create a patch and put that in the book

Re: Localnet bootscript

2005-04-14 Thread Nathan Coulson
On 4/14/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently built a version of 6.1 testing and when I rebooted into it I got a > Fail > for the localnet bootscript. The error message was > > RTNETLINK answers: File exists > > Looking at the script, the lines in question were > > ip link s

Localnet bootscript

2005-04-14 Thread Andrew Benton
I recently built a version of 6.1 testing and when I rebooted into it I got a Fail for the localnet bootscript. The error message was RTNETLINK answers: File exists Looking at the script, the lines in question were ip link set lo up ip addr add 127.0.0.1/8 label lo dev lo The solution to the prob

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
JÃrg Billeter wrote: Some plugins of Acrobat 7 need libstdc++.so.5, i.e. the standard c++ library coming with gcc 3.3. So either install it or remove the Reader/intellinux/plug_ins directory... Renaming the plugins directory worked. I may consider installing libstdc++.so.5 in the future, but I've

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Bruce Dubbs wrote: My typo. My fault. Sorry for all the effort. :(( I enjoyed it. I learned some stuff from this thread. And it's nice to see I'm not the only one that makes silly mistakes. ;) -- Jeremy Huntwork -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfroms

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Everyting works fine. Checking an older configuration, I have ERASECHAR 0177 Mine's 0177 here. Is it maybe worth comparing config.log's offline? King's X. All stop. My fault! In my script I have: sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@MD5_CRYPT_ENAB yes@' \

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess wrote: Mine's 0177 here. Is it maybe worth comparing config.log's offline? Matt. Likewise. -- Jeremy H. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Don, 2005-04-14 at 14:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Just to try it out, I donloaded a copy of Acrobat Reader 7 for Linux and > installed it. On my LFS 6.1 testing system it flashes the splash screen > and exits without any error messages of any kind. > > ldd on the binary does not show any

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Just to try it out, I donloaded a copy of Acrobat Reader 7 for Linux and installed it. On my LFS 6.1 testing system it flashes the splash screen and exits without any error messages of any kind. Yup, I get it here too. From the README: "Adobe Reader requires libstdc++.so.5."

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Everyting works fine. Checking an older configuration, I have ERASECHAR 0177 Mine's 0177 here. Is it maybe worth comparing config.log's offline? Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the ab

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I think I found the problem. In shadow-4.0.7, the file login.defs has: # Login configuration initializations: # # ERASECHAR Terminal ERASE character ('\010' = backspace). # KILLCHARTerminal KILL character ('\025' = CTRL/U). # UMASK Default "umask" value. #

Re: kernels, binutils, and stable releases

2005-04-14 Thread Heiko Zuerker
> Hi. Uhm, it's not looking like kernel-2.6 is going to be stable anytime > soon. I can't think of any reason that hlfs needs to be using 2.6. The > only thing that depends on it is glibc's nptl, but linuxthreads works > perfectly well too. > > For the sake of releasing something stable (in the fo

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: I know this doesn't help any, just wanted to throw in the mention that Xpdf seems to be *much* faster than the Adobe product. And doesn't have the privacy issues of Adobe's product either (http://lwn.net/Articles/129729/). Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/14/05 14:08 CST: > Just to try it out, I donloaded a copy of Acrobat Reader 7 for Linux and > installed it. On my LFS 6.1 testing system it flashes the splash screen > and exits without any error messages of any kind. > > ldd on the binary does not show any m

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jamie Bennett wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 14:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Just to try it out, I donloaded a copy of Acrobat Reader 7 for Linux and installed it. On my LFS 6.1 testing system it flashes the splash screen and exits without any error messages of any kind. ldd on the binary does no

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jamie Bennett wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 14:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Just to try it out, I donloaded a copy of Acrobat Reader 7 for Linux and installed it. On my LFS 6.1 testing system it flashes the splash screen and exits without any error messages of any kind. > Wrong list? No, not nece

Re: Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Jamie Bennett
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 14:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Just to try it out, I donloaded a copy of Acrobat Reader 7 for Linux and > installed it. On my LFS 6.1 testing system it flashes the splash screen > and exits without any error messages of any kind. > > ldd on the binary does not show any

Acrobat 7

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Just to try it out, I donloaded a copy of Acrobat Reader 7 for Linux and installed it. On my LFS 6.1 testing system it flashes the splash screen and exits without any error messages of any kind. ldd on the binary does not show any missing libraries and checking for permission problems I ran as

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bryan Kadzban wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: When I compiled the kernel, I turned off Legacy (BSD) PTY support. I'll build another kernel and add that back and see if that makes a difference. I don't think it will -- I have it off here too. But it'd be worth a shot. As you suspected, it did not make