Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Archaic wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:17:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Sorry. I should have specified. I get ^? printed on the screen in insert mode or in :ex mode. No characters are erased. A Ctrl-h works properly as a backspace should. I cannot reproduce this on any of the builds I've d

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-08 Thread Archaic
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:17:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > Sorry. I should have specified. I get ^? printed on the screen in > insert mode or in :ex mode. No characters are erased. > A Ctrl-h works properly as a backspace should. I cannot reproduce this on any of the builds I've done s

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: The backspace key is not working correctly in vim. I can fix the problem with echo "keycode 14 = BackSpace" | loadkeys but that doesn't seem right to me. It just isn't right, it will also break Emacs. I cannot reproduce this here, but my LFS is ra

Re: LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-08 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > The backspace key is not working correctly in vim. > I can fix the problem with >echo "keycode 14 = BackSpace" | loadkeys > > but that doesn't seem right to me. It just isn't right, it will also break Emacs. I cannot reproduce this here, but my LFS is rather old. Could

LFS 6.1-testing issues

2005-04-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I've just finished building lfs-testing SVN-20050402 from the 6.0 boot cd. Most things went fine and I have timing/size data that I will put together and post after bit. Right now the system is a plain LFS system with the only addition being ssl/ssh. I have run into a keyboard problem that I'd

From Switzerland

2005-04-08 Thread Deanne Gunter
Since 1924 our Official Swiss Pharm. has been the most trusted pharm. in the world, year after year. Unlike others, we allow you to order at your discretion, without any questions and with the Iron Clad Swiss Privacy Act assuring your order will be secure, delivered and all information will be

Re: /var/log/btmp permission problem.

2005-04-08 Thread Bryan Kadzban
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:30:02PM +0100, William Zhou wrote: > The message read as "Excess permission or bad ownership on file > /var/log/btmp." After changing to 640, it stops complianting. > That's a little odd. From openssh-4.0p1/loginrec.c: if((fst.st_mode & (S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO)) || (fst.s

/var/log/btmp permission problem.

2005-04-08 Thread William Zhou
Hi, I got time and read the log files. I found out that sshd keeps complianting about the permission of file /var/log/btmp. The message read as "Excess permission or bad ownership on file /var/log/btmp." After changing to 640, it stops complianting. The LFS book does not specify it clearly and