Re: 6.1 release branch

2005-04-03 Thread Matthew Burgess
Bryan Kadzban wrote: It actually registers udevsend as the handler, not udev. udevsend serializes events and then passes them to udev, IIRC. Maybe make the end of the last sentence look like: registered udevsend (which runs udev) as this handler. Yep, I spotted that a couple of weeks ago, but the

LFS-6.1-testing binutils failure

2005-04-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I am trying to build a test system from the LFS6 boot cd. In chapter 5, I can't even get through the 1st binutils: /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/bfd -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I../../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/bfd -I../../binutils

Re: 6.1 release branch

2005-04-03 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Good grief, I'm replying to myself a lot today! Anyway, I just saw what I think is a typo in section 7.4 (in the intro): Device nodes do not require much disk space, so the memory that is used in negligable. That should have an 's/ in / is /' done to it, I think. Also, I missed this in 7.4.2 the fi

Re: 6.1 release branch

2005-04-03 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Bryan Kadzban wrote: So when I got to autoconf, it failed to build, because the chapter 5 Perl did not have Data::Dumper installed (and /usr/bin/perl was in /tools). Oops, missed some words: s/in/looking for it in/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://linuxfromscratch.o

Re: 6.1 release branch

2005-04-03 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Bryan Kadzban wrote: If I run into other issues, I'll post them then. I've just finished compiling binutils pass 1 (yes, by hand, I have a whole weekend ;-) ). Well, I ran into two issues, but both of them seemed to be caused by my own mistakes (I really should come up with a scripted build syst

Re: 6.1 release branch

2005-04-03 Thread Matthew Burgess
Greg Schafer wrote: > Last time it was a question of attribution. LFS has a > poor record of crediting contributions. Well, FWIW I always try and note the bug reporter and fix-provider in the ChangeLog, and will here as well, of course. If I've previously missed anything then I apologise and req