Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Steve Crosby wrote:
>> I've added some script-foo to my build scripts to automatically
>> generate SBU's, Disk Usage and Installed Files details, and am
>> sharing below.
>
> before2=`df -k $LFS | grep $LFS | sed -e "s/ \{2,\}
Steve Crosby wrote:
I've added some script-foo to my build scripts to automatically generate
SBU's, Disk Usage and Installed Files details, and am sharing below.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/about.html
or you can just do a variation of:
TIMEFMT='%1R Elapsed Time - '
PROGRAM=sed-4.0.9
T
I've added some script-foo to my build scripts to automatically generate
SBU's, Disk Usage and Installed Files details, and am sharing below.
Something like this might be able to be added to the aLFS stuff, although
I haven't looked at that. Use if you wish ;)
add the following before the packa
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 06:44:13PM -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> Another nice thing to have lying around for cases like that is a
> livecd... ;)
Oh you wretched marketer... ;)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://w
Archaic wrote:
I'm on the fence about this one. I build a static bash and someother
static tools of which vim is one of them, for recovery needs, but I'm
not sure if the book should recommend that or install vim in /bin in the
first place. A somewhat valid argument would be sed for emergency
purpos
Archaic wrote:
I'm on the fence about this one. I build a static bash and someother
static tools of which vim is one of them, for recovery needs, but I'm
not sure if the book should recommend that or install vim in /bin in the
first place. A somewhat valid argument would be sed for emergency
purpos
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:29:06PM -0500, Aise Johan de Jong wrote:
>
> See subject. (Eg: so you can edit /etc/fstab.)
I'm on the fence about this one. I build a static bash and someother
static tools of which vim is one of them, for recovery needs, but I'm
not sure if the book should recommend t
See subject. (Eg: so you can edit /etc/fstab.)
-AJ
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
michelangelo wrote:
there is some reason why we don't use --with-gnu-ld flag in builds?
There is no reason to. The configure scripts that accept it will already
automatically determine when the system's 'ld' is GNU ld; this flag is
only used when you know that it is but the script cannot determin
hello,
i'm sorry if i touch a topic already discussed, but i've found no
evidence about in search engine about this.
there is some reason why we don't use --with-gnu-ld flag in builds?
thanks.
michelangelo
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:34:35AM +, Steve Crosby wrote:
>
> That said, a system that has that large a syslog load is likely to have a
> dedicated syslog server, which should mitigate the problem mentioned.
It doesn't take that much load to hit problems, BTW. A mail server
(which should be
11 matches
Mail list logo
