On 09-May-00 at 16:42, Rob Lahaye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The file BUG_REPORTING that comes in the LessTif source distribution can help
here. It describes how to get the info from gdb that we need. I'll add a couple
of comments to this message also, keep scrolling..
> Dear Mr. Hennessy,
>
May 7 03:00:00 -> May 9 15:48:26 (LessTifOthers)
3 lesstif-0.90.7.tar.gz
How long has it been there??? I scp'ed it, so I'm not in that number. I guess
there is a little interest in the product :)
configured fine, but...
Sorry for the cut off lines (see BugId #14 :)
make[4]: Entering directory
`/hdc1/home/rwscott/source/lesstif/scripts/lesstif/lesstif-0.90.7/test/Xm/filesb'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../../include/Motif-1.2
-I../../../include/Motif-1.2 -I../../../includ
..A widget with no parent, that just sort of appears..
On 10-May-00 at 18:11, Haral Tsitsivas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rick Scott wrote:
>
> > Do things work as expected if you use XtSetSensitive instead of
> > SetValues?? XtSetSensitive does alot more und
Danny, the script didn't seem to rm the test file used during the testing of
the writability of the srcdist directory. So the file
/usr/ftp/pub/hungry/lesstif/srcdist/test has been left around, and only you can
get rid of it.
This is probably why that test failed for you the first time. I was not
I haven't read this yet, and bugs.html was a bit of a surprize to me, but I
know there are some good points in BUG_REPORTING. Most of these are good for
any X app. I know it helped me when I was getting started. a few days
ago.
On 10-May-00 at 17:51, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wro
I just grabbed a copy of this, configured and tried to build. This is what I
get..
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include/Motif-1.2
-I../../include/Motif-1.2 -I../../include -I../../include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-g -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -Wall -DNONSTANDARD_CONVERTERS
On 12-May-00 at 03:27, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 04:33:46PM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > Or watching the commits list. Either way, I'm always surprized how fast
> > the new ones get snaped up. I'm configuring the 0.90.9 now, we
On 09-May-00 at 16:42, Sharad Kumar Gupta (EHPT) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Thanx a lot CP.. You caught the problem and its working fine..
> It was because of the pending events..
>
> Now another problem i am facing is about this warning :
> "Warning: XmForm form : attachment to
, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 16:40:04 -0400 (EDT), Rick Scott wrote:
>
> >I just grabbed a copy of this, configured and tried to build. This is what
> >I get..
> >
> >gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include/Moti
at I'm confused since I just
> got a bunch of "old" emails like this from the server.
>
> Is it really this old and took so long to come here?
>
> On Wed, 10 May 2000 18:01:50 -0400 (EDT), Rick Scott wrote:
On 12-May-00 at 19:00, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2000 16:22:43 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:29:39 -0500, Charles McKnight
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > Charles> I've just downloaded, built, and installed LessTif 0.90.
Ahh, never thought of that. This explains why some were making it through and
some weren't. I've probably been keeping you busy while I've been getting all
of my mail programs back in sync, sorry 'bout that.
On 12-May-00 at 19:33, Vern Hart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Alexander Mai wrote:
> >
Has anyone tried to read the motif/doc/ps stuff??? They all come up blank for
me with mgv and ghostview What a tease
not my idea of time well spent.
On 15-May-00 at 19:54, Mark Hatch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 01:20 PM 5/15/2000 -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> >Has anyone tried to read the motif/doc/ps stuff??? They all come up blank
> >for me with mgv and ghostview What a tease
>
&
Has anyone else subscribed to the (so called) OpenMotif mailing lists I
subscribed to them all this morning, but have seen nothing from them yet. Has
absolutely nothing been posted, or am I being black-balled from the lists??
On 15-May-00 at 19:54, Matthias Buelow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Alexander Mai wrote:
>
> >>I'm wondering how this will impact Lesstif. Are Lesstif
> >>developers precluded from using the source as a guide, even now?
>
> ["Future of LessTif" statement]
>
> I'm missing some kind of battle-cr
Yuck, this doesn't seem to be a very encouraging attitude. It makes me wonder
what the real reason for this action was
On 15-May-00 at 20:04, Suhaib M. Siddiqi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> OK this what I got in rsponse to Holger's questions about OpenMOTIf for
> OS/2 and Cygwin.
>
> OSF sai
There is a very good possibility that it is missing.
> Is LTV5Editres.c missing in the 0.91.0 (source) archives?
> As a CVS user I rarely use those packages, but just trying
> to build on an AIX 3 system and either I (or the machne ;-) messed up
> things or it's not included at all!
>
> -
It's pretty easy to get it into the dist, but looking at the Makefile.am I
don't see that we are ever picking one or the other. We always seem to use
LTV6Editres.c?
> Is LTV5Editres.c missing in the 0.91.0 (source) archives?
> As a CVS user I rarely use those packages, but just trying
> to b
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 09:35:42AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > There is a very good possibility that it is missing.
>
> Due to the new packaging system probably.
> Hmm, are there any other files like this in the tree which are built
> optionally?
xdnd.c is one that
Maybe we are doing it the Motif way.I just came across this in the OPENBUGS
file..
CDExc20430 Motif cannot handle font with negative lbearing
On 16-May-00 at 15:49, C Hennessy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Alexander Mai wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 07:38:23AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > > Has anything been done about this, or is Alexander still sleeping :)
> > > Either way I just did a gr
One thing I keep thinking about is, would I be getting involved with LessTif if
the situations was as it is now?? Personally, I'm not too sure right yet. Sure
the source is out now, but it is still controlled by TOG. How receptive are
they going to be to contributions from "outsiders". The license
People seem to be trivializing the license problem. One of the biggest problems
that I see with it goes as follows
- I contribute something to OpenMotif to make it a better product.
- I cannot use those contributions on any of my comercial HP's, Sun's,
whatever. I wrote it, but I can't use
On 16-May-00 at 22:43, Mark Hatch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 10:06 PM 5/16/2000 -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> >People seem to be trivializing the license problem. One of the biggest
> >problems
> >that I see with it goes as follows
> >
> >- I contribute so
Put the playing field has now been changed. Extensions to Motif are still
possible with add-on libraries, however things like tool-tips, bubble help or
whatever you want to call it, would be better done by a few dozen lines of code
in Primitive, as opposed to sub-classing _every_ primitive to get
> At 05:24 AM 5/17/2000 -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> >On 16-May-00 at 22:43, Mark Hatch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > At 10:06 PM 5/16/2000 -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > > >People seem to be trivializing the license problem. One of the biggest
> > > >
Do you get any warnings when you run this program??
My 30 second evaluation of this problem indicates that we may be missing a
resource converter for DIALOG_PROMPT. selectionbox/test1 shows that it works
when set with a SetArgs (you have to edit it).
On 19-May-00 at 03:09, Don Han ([EMAIL PROTE
nvert string "DIALOG_PROMPT" to type SelectionType"
>
> Thanks for your suggestion of using SetArgs.
> However, it is not a good option for me to choose at this point.
>
> -- Don --
>
>
> Rick Scott wrote:
> >
> > Do you get any warnings when
On 29-May-00 at 18:49, Danny Backx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I read this on linux.com :
> > IMHO, if you want to talk about robustness, Motif is still far and away
> > the most robust of the GUI toolkit libraries. Lesstif is somewhat less
> > than successful at emulating Motif's functionality;
On 30-May-00 at 19:31, Danny Backx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Does anyone have an idea on NEdit freeze problem as described
> > earlier here (and on nedit-dev@)?
> > Probably not (as the lack of postings indicates ;-)
>
> Do we know what really causes it ? This really means : can we reproduce
You can use
#if XmVERSION > 1
...
#else
...
#endif
There is an example in DropSMgr.h. Of course this is probably now going to need
a RepType of XmRShowArrows probably.which should also be in an #if
On 31-May-00 at 16:45, C Hennessy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
> Can some one gi
It looks reasonable to me. I would have thought that Xt would remove a grab
before destroying a window by itself, maybe not :) I also have a ddd report of
a freeze after dismissing a window, hopefully this helps that also.
I have 14 nedit reports in my inbox, which I will summarize in this note..
On 02-Jun-00 at 16:05, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Do I miss a flag to omit the test/ tree upon running configure?
> Would be useful in my setup on one of my machines:
> I have a Production and a Debug build tree, only the latter
> one featuring the tests. Since both are built from
Good questions. Wrt scenerio 2, I don't suspect that "releasing your changes
under both licenses" will be all that simple. I highly doubt that a patch made
against LessTif will apply cleanly to OpenMotif. Let's get specific for a
moment. I would like to get "tool-tips" out of Xlt's BubbleButton an
The fix for the nedit freeze is causing mgv to spit out the following when you
exit the app.
Warning: XtRemoveGrab asked to remove a widget not on the list
ddd is also emitting this warning upon startup.
I have some comments in LTRemoveGrabCallback that may be relevant to what you
have been
On 05-Jun-00 at 05:43, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 08:41:15AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > The fix for the nedit freeze is causing mgv to spit out the following
> > when you exit the app.
> >
> > Warning: XtRemoveGrab asked to
On 06-Jun-00 at 20:18, Carlos A M dos Santos ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote: > On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Rick Scott wrote:
>
> > By adding it to Primitive, we get it on all of these. This will
> > involve changes to Primitive:class_initialize, Primitive:set_values,
> > and the Ent
On 08-Jun-00 at 21:32, claudia e carniado rodriguez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote: > Hello. I was trying all day long to access the source distribution
using
> the web page www.lesstif.org unsuccesfully. I got the following error
> message:
>
> aftpd: Connection to terror.hungry.com failed
>
> Is th
On 09-Jun-00 at 04:57, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 05:37:13PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since Xbae and LessTif have merged, it has become impossible
> > (or at least difficult) to compile merely Xbae. Or have I
> > overlooked something?
> >
>
PushButton gadgets are currently missing something. If you can use widgets in
your menu the problem will probably go away. You mention a menu, and a radio
box, so you are most certainly using rowcolumn widgets.
Also if you drag to your choice, then , instead of
, then on your choice, you probab
This could be a bitch to find I tried for a couple of minutes,
and couldn't get it to happen. nedit was one of the apps that I used regularly
while writing the menu stuff, since it does some _really_ interesting stuff
during this.
Is there anyway that you, or someone else that sees this prob
I think I would be using XtPopup/XtPopdown.
On 15-Jun-00 at 16:23, Mead, Richard B. (RMEAD) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am using LessTif 0.91.0-1.i386 on RedHat 6.0 and have a pointer grab
> problem.
>
> After poping up (XtManageChild) a popup menu (in front of another
> application's
> mai
Has anyone tried to bring a stock Solaris machine up to something usefull for
development I've spent most of today attempting this, and I'm pretty close
to the point of saying "screw it", I'll install RedHat. First off, Sun seems
happy to ship with a cc that runs, however the only thing is doe
On 16-Jun-00 at 18:01, Jon Fo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rick,
>
> If you have Internet access, you can get a lot of stuff
> precompiled from http://www.freeware4sun.com. It's not
> the fastest site, but it has most everything you need,
> at least to get going. Also check out
Right, which i
Of course I would also need a cross compiled libc, no??? Which is just a little
bit further than I am willing to go in order to make Solaris usefull. Phrases
like "dug your own grave", and "flush" are coming to mind. Even the Sun can be
replaced these days..
>
> Good
On 18-Jun-00 at 19:14, Jim Lemon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rick Scott wrote:
> >
> ...Oh, wait
> > a minute."DEBUGSOURCES=all nedit" may show something interesting.
> > Also can you make it happen if you run "nedit -sync"
> > >
>
The autoconf bit is probably my fault. I probably built the release in question
at home. I'm not sure why we get the chmod errors, I don't see them at home.
The Makefile has been set to specifically ignore the errors, so I assume that
it is sometimes expected. The nightly is indeed in need of a tu
On 26-Jun-00 at 06:15, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:58:30AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > The autoconf bit is probably my fault. I probably built the release in
> > question at home. I'm not sure why we get the chmod errors, I don&#x
Okay, I've stayed out of this one for a while, but I stopped by the local on
the way home tonight, and think it's time to spout off :) We may not agree with
everything that RMS has to say, but we do owe him a hell of a lot. If it wasn't
for his opinion we wouldn't be where we are today. I'll admit
I seem to be seeing an "/img>" at the top right corner of the lesstif graphic
now.
> Though I doubt we have many OS/2 users here on the list I want
You may be surprized.We seem to have had 10 downloads so far
One of the first problems that I see BaseClass.c line 1868. This determines
whether or not the resource list needs to be de-compiled, or simply copied. But
a resource_offset will always be >= 0, since it is a Cardinal, right??
> WRT to the 'VDX problem' I really look out for a more capable
> vo
>
> > One of the first problems that I see BaseClass.c line 1868. This
> > determines whether or not the resource list needs to be de-compiled, or
> > simply copied. But a resource_offset will always be >= 0, since it is a
> > Cardinal, right??
>
> No. Two things: note the (int) cast in the co
>
> > Seriously though, the function shouldn't fail unless the conditional
> > fails. If the conditional is failing, perhaps it should be > instead
> > of >= ? Is the problem child at offset zero?
>
> Er. Nevermind. Offset zero is legal. What value does the
> conditional fail on?
107492646
Damn, probably an X11R6 thing. We should have a configure variable laying
around somewhere to avoid compiling this thing..
> When i make the test directory of the Lesstif source.
> compile can't find XtRegisterDrawable.
> the error message is :
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/APP2/less
iginal Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Scott
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 1:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Hungry CVS: amai : hungry/lesstif/lib/Xm-2.0[...]
> >
> >
> > >
I suspect we have some sort of _very_ serious corruption going on. Try this...
gdb ./test7
break main
run
break BaseClass.c:_XmTransformSubResources
cont
where
You end up at _XmGetClassExtensionPtr () at BaseClass.c:1903!!!
What gives?
On 05-Jul-00 at 17:07, Rick Scott ([EMAIL
On 06-Jul-00 at 03:58, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 05:06:02PM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > But it's not exactly a resource offset once compiled, right?? After all,
> > we are looking for a (int)Cardinal < 0, which means a Cardinal >
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 05:50:55AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> [...]
> > > But did omitting this check, i.e. take the else{} part fix test7 for
> > > you??
> >
> > It stopped the core dump, but the resources you end up with are not
> > correct
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:39:21 -0400 (EDT), Rick Scott wrote:
>
> >
> >> I confess the only app which would for sure benefit is vdx, and
> >> we even don't know for sure that it won't crash beyond ;-)
> >
> >This may be the underlying cause
Somewhere along the line we have introduced 40 byte leaks into command/test3,
selectionbox/test9, textf/test8. Since they are all 40 bytes I can't help but
think there is something in common.
Just about to start some final testing on the Vendor resource corruption
stuff.Cross your fin
I've noticed in the last couple of days some anomylies with ddd. If you start
it up displaying the source, then on say main, "main" gets
highlighted, as I would expect, however upon the selection goes from
"main" to the end of the Text. I'm not sure when this started happening, as I
am just star
Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 05:50:39PM -0700, Rick Scott wrote:
> > rwscott 2000/07/06 17:50:38 PDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > lesstif/lib/Xm BaseClass.c BulletinBoard.c CutPaste.c
> > DialogS.c Vendor.c
> > Log:
> >
I just managed to get openMotif to compile and was comparing some of our test
results against it. I get identical results between us and them for
drawnbutton/test10, can someone please double check these results with Motif
1.2. Seems like we may have fixed a Motif 1.2 bug without even knowing it :
On 13-Jul-00 at 04:16, R. Lahaye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Alexander Mai wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 04:34:33PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've just compile Grace against the current version
> > > of Lesstif (as of July 13th). I get a "broken pipe"
> > >
hanges
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 05:55:38AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > > BTW: I've compiled Grace 5.1.1 official release, which was
> > > running fine with a previous CVS version of LessTif. My
> > > conclusion is that in the last few days/weeks this bug ha
On 13-Jul-00 at 21:26, R. Lahaye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rick Scott wrote:
> >
> > This looks perfectly normal to me. To quote from the fvwm man page
> >
> > "Destroy
> > Destroys an application window, which usually
> >
Before the "run -sync", do "break exit". This should put in a breakpoint before
the program exits. There's some good general info on tracing these things down
in the BUG_REPORTING file from the lesstif distribution.
On 13-Jul-00 at 20:21, R. Lahaye ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
similar
in response to you pushing the X, then this is what should happen. That is what
it means when it says "explicit kill".
On 13-Jul-00 at 20:53, R. Lahaye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rick Scott wrote:
> >
> > The "X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or
I'm sure you could check the Xfe stuff out of the Mozilla CVS. cvs co
mozilla/cmd/xfe should get you all of the xfe stuff, including the Microline
and Xfe widgets
>
> I think it's time to remove Mozilla from the list of applications that run
> with LessTif. I have been looking at their
> While CVS is non-available I am looking for a summary of what's still
> to be done related to the "BaseClass" changes:
>
> - there was this thread "RE: lesstif-CVS bug: Broken pipe with Grace "
>w/o a final conclusion. As Martin told me his last suggestion isn't
>the way to go (-> rea
Substantial??? They seem very resonable compared to the ones you showed for DU
:)
I think this whole threads thing is "barking up the wrong tree". If I recall
correctly the issue is getting notified of some sort of event, which we happen
to be doing differently depending on whether threads are involved. I think I
looked into this and concluded that we could do it with an XtEven
In these cases I think we should be favouring the XtGC functions over the XGC
ones. The Xt functions are a little more freindly when it comes to sharing,
however they do require a little more thought be put into them, with respect to
how they can be shared.
On 02-Aug-00 at 20:34, Alexander M
On 02-Aug-00 at 20:34, Carlos A M dos Santos ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote: > On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
>
> > Testing for the existence of XtToolkitThreadInitialize is not enough. The
> > result must be tested too, since even in non thread-aware implementations
> > the function
Unless I've read this patch wrong, I think we should be changing the
XCreateGC's to XtCreateGC's, instead of the other way around.
On 02-Aug-00 at 20:34, Steve Olson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Here's a fix for a memory leak. GCs that are created with
> XCreateGC should be freed with XFree
Well we don't support other "vendor improvements". Like the handling of
labelStrings that Sun thought was a good idea. Now if they do something
usefull, or something similar is going to be needed in 2.0, maybe we should
keep them around. I had a real quick look, and couldn't figure out which stubs
Ahh, those ones. They do absolutly nothing, and are probably replaced with the
render table stuff. I don't think they will be missed..
On 04-Aug-00 at 08:39, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 08:29:34AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > Well we
Related to the BaseClass stuff. We cannot treat the extension data like a
normal widget. The XtAddCallback on line 230 of Xme.c needs to be changed. grep
for _XtAddCallback in Vendor and make the one in Xme.c look like it.
On 04-Aug-00 at 10:09, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote: > Some we
On 04-Aug-00 at 11:15, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 10:18:19AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > Related to the BaseClass stuff. We cannot treat the extension data like a
> > normal widget. The XtAddCallback on line 230 of Xme.c needs to be
> &
Good luck. LessTif is meant to implement the Motif "look and feel". My only
question is, why does this app "need" round, and sort of round buttons? This
looks like a usefull app, not a game. Will it not sell unless the buttons are
round
On 14-Aug-00 at 19:27, Cameron Laird ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
I couldn't find an address to send this to, so I just sent it to the list...
You _cannot_ use a library compiled with libc5 on a libc6, aka glib2, based
system. RedHat 6.2 is such a system. You need to get the libc6 compiled version
of LessTif, or get the source and compile it yourself. To compil
It's in MenuShell, which may explain why we still have some tear-off problems
:)
On 24-Aug-00 at 16:09, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I just found the probably earliest comment in the sources:
>
> rws 24 Feb 1197
>
> What's a Win* 2000 vs. a LessTif 1200 ... ;-)
>
> --
> Alexan
Okay, I thought I was wrong for a while, but I'm pretty sure now that the patch
to help the expose of list items went just a little bit too far. With ml, the D
flag is not showing up as I plough through my mail hitting
"Delete +". The messages are getting deleted, since they are gone after a
"Rem
On 01-Sep-00 at 02:09, Peter Stein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Rick Scott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not realy sure, if I'm the one you are adressing, but anyhow ...
>
> > Okay, I thought I was wrong for a while, but I'm pretty sure now that
On 01-Sep-00 at 04:17, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Now that 0.91.8 is out, I had a look at the archive sizes and found
> some surprising facts:
>
> - lesstif-current is bigger than lesstif-0.91.8
current is simply a tarball of a working tree. The nightly also processes the
man pa
w item, how would it have been drawn last time??
On 01-Sep-00 at 02:09, Peter Stein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Rick Scott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not realy sure, if I'm the one you are adressing, but anyhow ...
>
> > Okay, I thought I was
On 01-Sep-00 at 08:49, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:02:05AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > Analysis:
> >
> > During the operation in question, ml calls XmListReplaceItemsPos with a
> > position of 0. This replaces the entire lis
Has anybody looked into this one yet?? Apparently we are not doing the button
count correct. But what I get from the man pages, neither is Motif. From the
man page
"A Pulldown MenuPane can be attached only
to a CascadeButton or CascadeButtonGadget, and only
Danny, have you ever heard anything back from the openMotif dudes with respect
to some of the issues that we raised. They seem to have all retreated back into
obscurity. There was a lot of hype, they got a CVS up, issued some patches,
which didn't seem to make it into CVS, promised some answers, o
I finally got around to getting openMotif to compile on my box. Okay, I had to
#if 0 out a wack of stuff dealing with XICProc's, whatever they are, so these
results may be tainted a bit. Anyway, here is what I found..
With LessTif
we fail 63 out of 555 tests
With openMotif
we fail 92 out of
On 12-Sep-00 at 05:19, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 09:46:54PM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > I finally got around to getting openMotif to compile on my box. Okay, I
> > had to #if 0 out a wack of stuff dealing with XICProc's, whatever th
On 12-Sep-00 at 05:10, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 07:35:10AM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > Rick wrote :
> > > Danny, have you ever heard anything back from the openMotif dudes with
> > > respect to some of the issues that we raised. They seem to have all
> >
On 12-Sep-00 at 05:51, st002279 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:21:54AM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > > Did I miss something special?
> > > What exactly are the issues you're talking about?
> >
> > License issues. RMS mostly beats on the platform dependency in the
> > lice
On 12-Sep-00 at 06:16, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:03:48AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > On 12-Sep-00 at 05:51, st002279 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:21:54AM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > > >
On 12-Sep-00 at 10:07, Mark Hatch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 06:00 PM 9/11/2000 -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> >Is this essentially dead, or have I just been kicked off the mailing
> >list?? What's with the patch[1-5]? Are they not in the CVS? What tag
> >should I be p
On 12-Sep-00 at 10:12, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Forgot to mention some things
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:55:13AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > On 12-Sep-00 at 05:19, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 09:46:54PM
On 12-Sep-00 at 13:19, Steve Olson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I think the textf and fsb problems are related to the textf destroy
> > problem.
>
> No.
Well, when I run the fsb tests in question in gdb they are segfaulting in
TextF:destroy, which to me seems to indicate a relationship.
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
