On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> Sounds like we would need to maintain the right order of directories
> in the SUBDIR line in lib/ and include/ and things should just work.
>
> Does anyone object to my making this change ?
>
> Danny
>
> Rick Scott wrote:
> >
We can obviously also eliminate complexity in the build, which
is one of our problems right now.
Danny
Alexander Mai wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > Sounds like we would need to maintain the right order of directories
> > in the SUBDIR line in li
I've spent a little time on simpler config -
allow building more than one version
install them all in the same place (exec_prefix/{include,bin,lib})
don't bother with symlinks
don't bother with all kinds of checks in configure.in
I can commit it if you want.
Danny
--
Danny Backx
Apologies for following up to myself. Here's the result of installing
LessTif, Xbae, Xlt in /usr/lesstif with the new config.
Default install would put this in /usr/local instead of /usr/lesstif.
dell: {42} du /usr/lesstif
80 /usr/lesstif/include/Xbae
148 /usr/lesstif/include/Xlt
1140
> dell: {262} ./CVSMake
> ./CVSMake running in /home/danny/Hungry/LessTif/sourceforge.net/lesstif
> configure.in:361: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
Do we need to leave the explicit call to AC_PROG_LEX for older
versions of the auto-tools, or can it be removed ?
Danny
--
Da
Good point.
> As Danny indicates the result should be roughly the same
> if we just write (similar)
>
> if Default_version_12
> SUBDIRS= lib/Xm lib/Xm-2.1
> else
> SUBDIRS= lib/Xm-2.1 lib/Xm
> endif
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:22:55 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
>I've spent a little time on simpler config -
> allow building more than one version
> install them all in the same place (exec_prefix/{include,bin,lib})
Ok, where are our experts?
Headers probably should go into prefix/include instead?!
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:02:13PM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > dell: {262} ./CVSMake
> > ./CVSMake running in /home/danny/Hungry/LessTif/sourceforge.net/lesstif
> > configure.in:361: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
>
> Do we need to leave the explicit call to AC_PROG_LEX for older
>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:20:46AM +0200, Albert Graef wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > [...]
> > Question : I currently run "xplore -C -sync" to see things. But this
> > pops up an "xterm -C" before dying. Is there a better way ?
>
> Ok, here are some patches against xplore-1.1 which allow you to
Starting after a maintainer-clean...
automake barfed on the --ignore-deps
during the build I get the famous "can't link to *.la"
after an install, the only headers installed are the Dt headers.
I guess I need to look at my auto tools, but the make install is certainly not
installing everything.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:43:28 -0400 (EDT), Rick Scott wrote:
>Starting after a maintainer-clean...
>
>automake barfed on the --ignore-deps
>during the build I get the famous "can't link to *.la"
>after an install, the only headers installed are the Dt headers.
>
>I guess I need to look at my auto
Alexander Mai wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:02:13PM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
>
>>>dell: {262} ./CVSMake
>>>./CVSMake running in /home/danny/Hungry/LessTif/sourceforge.net/lesstif
>>>configure.in:361: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
>>>
>>Do we need to leave the explicit call to
I didn't specify anything
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --prefix=/tmp/lesstif
After a make install, I only have the 2.1 libs, and the only headers installed
are the Dt headers.
On 29-Aug-01 at 17:56, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:43:28 -0400 (EDT), R
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:02:05 +0200, Albert Graef wrote:
>Followup: The new release (xplore-1.1a) is already available from the
>xplore homepage.
>
>
>> Ok, meanwhile the XmObjectAtPoint() hack is obsolete
>> (though we still need to confirm that the current one is
>> more or less working; signat
We've seen this several times before, and as it turns out, even different
implementations of OSF/Motif handle it differently.
-Jon
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Bugs item #456132, was opened at 2001-08-28 06:54
>You can respond by visiting:
>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?fun
Hi there,
I'm a novice with Xt and need help with some basics:
How do I make ctrl+LMB to make additional selections? Do I change the
translation table or do I use the mouse event handler or do I change the
fallback resources?
Could somebody share their example code with me?
Thanx:)
Joanna
Does anyone know about the "Motif Verification Suite"
which can be retrieved from
http://www.opengroup.org/testing/downloads.html
?
Shall we add another 5MB to our test tree? :-)
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo