Hi,
I am trying to package .NET 7 in Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142178
(This is a new package, though it's "just" an updated version of the .NET
6 package that we already include in Fedora.)
The reviewer has helped identify that the source code archive includes a
few fi
Hi,
I have been working on moving the (still in review) .NET 7 package to
the new SPDX identifiers in the License field and I had some additional
questions that I could use some guidance on.
1. What, if anything, do I need to do about the "MS Patent Promise"?
Full text here: https://github.co
Hi,
Richard Fontana writes:
> If it's no trouble, please submit an issue to
> fedora-license-data proposing this as a new license.
Done: https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/102
Thanks!
Omair
--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed response! I am still working through most of
this, but want to get some clarification on this one:
Richard Fontana writes:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:07 PM Omair Majid wrote:
>
>> 5. Is there an SPDX identifier for "Unicode Mappings License"
Hi,
Omair Majid writes:
> Richard Fontana writes:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:07 PM Omair Majid wrote:
>>
>>> 5. Is there an SPDX identifier for "Unicode Mappings License"?
>>>
>>>An example of this license is also at
>>
Hi Richard,
Sorry to bother you, but any advice on this?
Omair Majid writes:
> I am trying to package .NET 7 in Fedora:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142178
>
> (This is a new package, though it's "just" an updated version of the .NET
> 6 pack
Hi Jilayne,
Richard Fontana writes:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:07 PM Omair Majid wrote:
>>
>>
>> 4. What license is this file under?
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/System.Text.RegularExpressions/tests/FunctionalT
Hi
Thanks to everyone, especially Richard, for their advice and
suggestions.
As far as I can tell, these are the remaining licensing questions before
we are ready to include .NET 7 in Fedora:
1. How to define the MS Patent Promise [1] in Fedora?
The discussion is continuing at
https://git
Hi,
Omair Majid writes:
> As far as I can tell, these are the remaining licensing questions before
> we are ready to include .NET 7 in Fedora:
>
> 1. How to define the MS Patent Promise [1] in Fedora?
>
>The discussion is continuing at
>https://gitlab.com/fedora
Jilayne Lovejoy writes:
> Just following up on this: the two licenses above that you say have no
> progress, so they have issues in the Fedora-license-list Gitlab repo,
> and, if applicable, SPDX?
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/138
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/f
Hey,
Ben Beasley writes:
> Although I haven’t signed up to do the official review, I was looking
> at python-meshio[1], and I found that it contains a function
> substantially derived from a StackOverflow answer[2]. While I’m
> impressed that upstream cared enough to give credit, this leaves me
11 matches
Mail list logo
