On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 9:49 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2022 03:12, Richard Fontana wrote:
> # src/utils/qurltlds_p.h which is MPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0-or-later OR
> LGPL-2.1-or-later,
> >>> Given the nature of this file, I'd just omit this.
> >> why do you say this?
> > This h
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:07 PM Omair Majid wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on moving the (still in review) .NET 7 package to
> the new SPDX identifiers in the License field and I had some additional
> questions that I could use some guidance on.
>
> 1. What, if anything, do I need to do ab
Hi,
Richard Fontana writes:
> If it's no trouble, please submit an issue to
> fedora-license-data proposing this as a new license.
Done: https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/102
Thanks!
Omair
--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:07 PM Omair Majid wrote:
>
>
> 4. What license is this file under?
>
>
> https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/System.Text.RegularExpressions/tests/FunctionalTests/AttRegexTests.cs
>
>Should I treat it as under MIT, like the license header at t
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:07 PM Omair Majid wrote:
> 8. Is there a SPDX identifier for this variant of MIT:
>
>http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~tjw/jsbn/LICENSE
>
>Internally, I have seen this referred to as "mit-addition".
I believe this is the same as the license I recently submitt
