[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] uloop: make SIGCHLD signal handling optional

riable. Signed-off-by: Petar Paradzik --- uloop.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/uloop.c b/uloop.c index d2f41bb..c43082b 100644 --- a/uloop.c +++ b/uloop.c @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static struct list_head processes = LIST_HEAD_INIT(processes); static int poll

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] uloop: make SIGCHLD signal handling optional

It is already present (in the master), but not used. Regards, Petar On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-07-03 13:37, Petar Paradzik wrote: >> Some programs want to manage their own child life cycle without using >> SIGCHLD signal handler. In these

[LEDE-DEV] uci proposal

Hello everyone, Regarding the mandatory anonymous section identifier patch: http://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/uci.git;a=commit;h=df72af474075159ab79ed190d2109eb2d86709bf. Is it ok if naming of anonymous sections was optional, so that it is performed only if the user requests for it? This could b