Would you not like to turn your router into a low cost hardware load
balancer like Big IP?
Whether you run your own business or just home office services like
eMail, print server, and and a local wiki, it gets annoying when you
have to turn down a server for upgrades or maintenance. When you d
, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 24 March 2017 at 23:43, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
I do take no notice and care very little about the various versions of open
source license. They annoy me a lot.
Licenses are an American thing. I am European.
It is sufficient to say it is open and free.
If you want to
I built trunk r3987 and luci mwan3 is no longer there.
My previous build was r3680 and all was good.
What happened to mwan3?
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
How long should we expect to wait until this project is considered to be
included in lede?
On 26/03/17 04:19, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
OK
I will wait to receive feedback on the actual software and I will
collate all the changes (if any).
I have been using this solution since February 2016
I think Edwin highlights one of the main issues associated with both
OpenWRT and LEDE
The issue is that, although these are "open" projects, the participation
is de-facto closed to a small group of core developers that make it
particularly challenging for anyone outside to contribute.
The vo
The last time I built lede it was r4041
Today I updated to r4116 and mwan3 no longer works.
In: cgi-bin/luci/admin/network/mwan
I have all interfaces showing offline and red with the following:
MWAN Interface Systemlog
*No MWAN systemlog history found*
Since sometimes feeds might not be upda
Mauro Mozzarelli :
The last time I built lede it was r4041
Today I updated to r4116 and mwan3 no longer works.
In: cgi-bin/luci/admin/network/mwan
I have all interfaces showing offline and red with the following:
MWAN Interface Systemlog
*No MWAN systemlog history found*
Since sometimes feeds
setting
the PATH variable.
Mauro
On 13/05/17 12:27, Yousong Zhou wrote:
On 13 May 2017 at 19:15, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
It looks like the problem extends also to other systems and might be traced
back to the relocation of
/usr/bin/ip
to
/sbin/ip
For your information, fix for mwan3 ha
Two days ago I have done a fresh git pull (from scratch) and I built
LEDE without errors (well mwan3 still not working, but that is a
different matter because LEDE did build).
After the latest update done just right now, LEDE fails to build with
the following:
Configuring kmod-usb-storage-ex
My requirement is as follows:
From Location A I want to be able to receive and place phone calls
using the Public Switched Telephone Network line present on Location B.
On both Location A and B I have BT Home Hub 5 routers running LEDE.
I was wondering if it were possible (and how to) run a
After the latest git update today lede code fails to build with the
following:
mkdir -p /spi/router/lede/trunk-ipvs/bin/targets/lantiq/xrx200/packages
/spi/router/lede/trunk-ipvs/build_dir/target-mips_24kc_musl/util-linux-2.30.1/ipkg-mips_24kc/dmesg/CONTROL
/spi/router/lede/trunk-ipvs/staging
It fails also with fresh git pull:
Checking 'grep'... ok.
Checking 'getopt'... ok.
Checking 'stat'... ok.
Checking 'unzip'... ok.
Checking 'bzip2'... ok.
Checking 'wget'... ok.
Checking 'perl'... ok.
Checking 'python'... ok.
Checking 'git'... ok.
Checking 'file'... ok.
Checking 'ldconfig-stub'..
Wrong thread.
My apologies
On 23/08/17 09:29, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
It fails also with fresh git pull:
Checking 'grep'... ok.
Checking 'getopt'... ok.
Checking 'stat'... ok.
Checking 'unzip'... ok.
Checking 'bzip2'... ok.
Checking &#x
Will this be fixed so that a normal git pull will no longer fail?
On 23/08/17 10:12, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
On 2017-08-23 10:39, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
On 23-08-17, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
Now this one pops up again (reported by Mauro Mozzarelli yesterday):
find
/mnt/ramdisk/test
From r4940-00e9a7a release, just built, BT Home Hub 5 router fails to
connect to dsl at boot.
After issuing:
# /etc/init.d/dsl_control stop
and then
# /etc/init.d/dsl_control start
It will reconnect eventually, but it won't automatically after a reboot.
I have seen a lantiq patch coming th
Since r4940 BT Home Hub 5 router fails to connect to DSL on boot.
No attempts are made to start DSL.
This is a blocking issue. I am concerned I have not received an
acknowledgement or questions this issue.
On 28/09/17 20:25, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
From r4940-00e9a7a release, just built, BT
I have now opened bug FS#1028
On 30/09/17 16:44, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Since r4940 BT Home Hub 5 router fails to connect to DSL on boot.
No attempts are made to start DSL.
This is a blocking issue. I am concerned I have not received an
acknowledgement or questions this issue.
On 28/09
I would go for option 1
There is little to gain from the new kernel and lots to risk in terms of
time, compatibility, additional work.
On 07/10/17 12:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
We had some discussions in IRC about the kernel version which should be
used in the next major release after 17.01.
Where is regdb.txt gone? Has it been replaced by a file with a different
name?
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Hello,
I am trying to compile trunk just pulled today and this is how it fails:
[...]
Configuring libpopt.
Configuring getopt.
Configuring gzip.
Configuring atm-tools.
Configuring kmod-ltq-deu-vr9.
Configuring kmod-fs-cifs.
Configuring kmod-usb-storage-extras.
Configuring xz-utils.
Configurin
Hello,
I understand that odhcpd-ipv6only has now become the default and it
conflicts with odhcpd.
Please could you let me know if odhcpd-ipv6only supports the existing
configuration file /etc/config/dhcp?
And what if I have an ipv4 only LAN?
What was the rationale for the switch?
And fi
...again, on the latest changes...
I noticed the firmware now builds with "openwrt" prefix instead of "lede".
I am building for xrx200 lantiq (BT Home Hub 5). With previous LEDE
builds I used to get both ubifs and squashfs firmware versions built.
Now I get only squashfs. Is there a new conf
Why not leave it as a configurable (in .config) option?
ubifs is faster
On 12/12/17 12:56, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
...again, on the latest changes...
I noticed the firmware now builds with "openwrt" prefix instead of
"lede".
I am building for xrx200 lantiq (BT Home H
Please can we have an option to build ubifs firmware?
I noticed a considerable slow down especially at boot time using
squashfs firmware on BT Home Hub 5A.
Thank you.
On 12/12/17 13:57, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Why not leave it as a configurable (in .config) option?
ubifs is faster
On
Since about the last 10 days, when I do a make menuconfig, on exit save
I do get the following warnings that I had not seen before (it is a long
list and I include only some excerpts). I also pulled a fresh trunk in
case I missed something in the updates, but they did not go away. Am I
doing an
Quick question on lede to openwrt remerge (sorry I do not read all the
messages..)
What is the merged openwrt trunk development repository now?
This?
https://github.com/lede-project/source.git
[so far I have been using this which gets updated]
Or this?
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt.gi
I am not sure if you are already aware, master fails to build after
today's git pull:
-sections -std=c99 -znow -zrelro -Wl,--gc-sections -o openvpn argv.o
base64.o buffer.o clinat.o comp.o compstub.o comp-lz4.o crypto.o
crypto_openssl.o crypto_mbedtls.o dhcp.o error.o event.o fdmisc.o
forward
I noticed that in the latest builds (from r6375 and onwards) mwan3
status cgi-bin/luci/admin/status/mwan is missing the graphic traffic
light boxes. Is this an error or have they been removed?
The last build I have with the graphics is r6320 - git-18.062.27847-1e46a67
___
Sorry, I have no time to read the whole thread, so I have a quick
question in the hope someone could provide a quick answer:
Does the latest official release 17.01.4 include SMP for lantiq BT Home
Hub 5? The main reason I keep using master is because the last time I
tried the official release
Since the last update that took me to OpenWrt SNAPSHOT r6520-02fba1a /
LuCI Master (git-18.081.35142-84b3ba4)
Under system->Backup / Flash Firmware
I get this nagging message inside a highlighted yellow box:
"Custom files (certificates, scripts) may remain on the system. To
prevent this, per
Hello,
When I switched from OpenWrt to LEDE static routes configured on my
network stopped working.
My configuration is as follows:
Internet ADSL
|
|
Internet ADSLRouter C
[Dynamic IP]
John,
To summarize, with my use case scenarios I am trying to make the point
that the effort to make the Red Ethernet behave as a WAN does not have
to be a priority because it is the least useful case on this router.
The priority should be:
1) to make it usable as another Ethernet interface
On 12/02/17 15:56, Mathias Kresin wrote:
12.02.2017 15:55, Felix Fietkau:
@Mathias: could you perhaps refactor the commits to put the wan->xwan
rename *after* the ethernet port VLAN change?
I'm also a bit sceptical about the interface rename and would like to
discuss this further, but I think t
I configured one of my routers with 2 x WAN using mwan3 package.
All is OK when the requests are outgoing.
There is a routing issue with incoming connections.
In practical terms I can have incoming connections only on the WAN
interface that is configured with the lowest default metric (set at
at only the
minority of the uses managed to configure a working ethernet wan.
Mathias
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
--
Mauro Mozzarelli
eMail: ma...@ezplanet.net
Phone: +44 7941 727378
_
on the Yellow switch and WAN on the Red Ethernet.
This does not happen with the unmodified code where the Red Ethernet is
configured as eth1.2.
It looks like the Ethernet ports get into an identity crisis with the patch.
Mauro
On 16/02/17 17:37, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Mathias,
I have just
I was wondering someone could help me the following problem:
I want to add some device drivers to the kernel build, but the kernel
configuration in kernel version 3 is different from the configuration in
kernel version 4.
I was looking for a parameter that I could use inside an .mk file to
f
Mathias,
Thank you for the patch
I just built SNAPSHOT r3526-bececcc with your "fix arp package leaking
in xrx200" patch and the problem is solved.
Excellent work.
Thank you!
Mauro
On 18/02/17 15:57, Mathias Kresin wrote:
17.02.2017 11:42, Mauro Mozzarelli:
The BT Home H
Mathias,
Thank you for the patch
I just built SNAPSHOT r3526-bececcc with your "fix arp package leaking
in xrx200" patch and the problem is solved.
Excellent work.
Thank you!
Mauro
On 18/02/17 15:57, Mathias Kresin wrote:
17.02.2017 11:42, Mauro Mozzarelli:
The BT Home H
On 18.02.2017 12.49, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
So far with trial and error (unfortunately I could not find specific
documentation) I found that I can test reliably a variable that includes
both kernel version and patchlevel as follows:
LINUX_4_0||LINUX_4_1||LINUX_4_2||LINUX_4_3||LINUX_4_4||LINUX_4_5
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Sun Feb 19 11:33:23 2017 +
IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load balancing
inside the Linux kernel, so called Layer-4 switching. IPVS running on a
host acts as a load balancer at the front of a cluster of real servers,
it can direct
build.
Mauro
On 20/02/17 09:40, Jonas Gorski wrote:
On 19 February 2017 at 12:50, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Thanks to those who provided directions.
I will settle with checking on LINUX_3_18.
I am not sure who manages build variables, but in future it would be useful
to be able to identify which
02/2017 13:01, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Sun Feb 19 11:33:23 2017 +
IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load balancing
^ stray tab
inside the Linux kernel, so called Layer-4 switching. IPVS running on a
host acts as a load balancer at the f
services of the real servers to appear as a virtual service on
a single IP address.
This patch adds kmod-nf-ipvs kernel modules option to LEDE kernel netfilter
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
---
package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk | 100
++
1 file changed
elper-extra.
Mauro
On 24/02/17 10:43, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load balancing
inside the Linux kernel, so called Layer-4 switching. IPVS running on
a host acts as a load balancer at the front of a cluster of real
servers, it can direct req
services of the real servers to appear as a virtual service on
a single IP address.
This patch adds kmod-nf-ipvs kernel modules option to LEDE kernel netfilter
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
---
package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk | 89
+++
1 file changed, 89
/02/17 10:30, John Crispin wrote:
On 24/02/2017 12:42, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load balancing
inside the Linux kernel, so called Layer-4 switching. IPVS running on a
host acts as a load balancer at the front of a cluster of real servers,
it can
on scripts conforming with openwrt/lede
standards.
The package fits in /package/network/utils.
Please could you let me know whether I can post the patch to add ipvsadm
here or if I have to follow a different process?
Mauro
On 28/02/17 11:52, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Hello John,
I sent the f
n 28/02/17 11:53, John Crispin wrote:
On 28/02/2017 12:52, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Then I take the output from git format-patch and I post it to the
mailing list.
How exactly did you do this ? i assume using copy&paste into your mail
client ? try using "git send-email"
@John,
I send this patch using git send-email. Please let me know if this one
is OK.
Please note that patches sent previously are superseded by this version.
Mauro
On 28/02/17 15:54, ma...@ezplanet.org wrote:
From: Mauro Mozzarelli
IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load
I have been trying to make a very simple contribution to LEDE, but it
has been a frustrating process because my contribution got stuck due to
form rather than substance.
Unfortunately this might turn away contributors who do not have the
patience to persevere.
I would like to suggest, that w
Hello,
I am a newby with luci and I hope to find some help.
I need to present a DynamicList of values that I need to take from a
configuration file
I tried to look at get_zones and get_networks functions as an example to
build my own code, but when I invoke them like this:
local net = r
Hello,
I would like to make contributions to lede, but so far I bumped into a
series of obstacles.
So far I tried the following:
git format-patch, then copy and paste into email -> was not accepted
git send-email -> I do not know whether the patch was accepted, I did
not receive any feedb
I did, but it isn't there, so something has not worked.
I have now created a pull request.
It isn't perfect in its form as I meant originally to create one request
each for the kernel and for the tool, but I couldn't tame git to do what
I wanted.
I hope this one finally goes through:
https
On 08/03/17 00:59, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Mar 3, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
Hi,
Am 03.03.2017 um 17:55 schrieb Mauro Mozzarelli:
I would like to suggest, that when a new potential contributor is
putting forward his proposed change, an expert buddy is assigned to
guide the
I just pulled the latest from master and the build fails with the following:
g++-uc -Os -pipe -mno-branch-likely -mips32r2 -mtune=24kc
-fno-caller-saves -fno-plt -fhonour-copts
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -Wno-error=unused-result -msoft-float
-mips16 -minterlink-mips16
-iremap/sto/rou
56 matches
Mail list logo
