Re: [LEDE-DEV] Bad NAND my sysupgrade / help

2018-02-02 Thread Denis Periša
root@RECOVERY:/# ubinfo /dev/ubi1 ubi1 Volumes count: 0 Logical eraseblock size: 258048 bytes, 252.0 KiB Total amount of logical eraseblocks: 15 (3870720 bytes, 3.7 MiB) Amount of available logical eraseblocks: 0 (0 bytes) Maximum count of volumes

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Bad NAND my sysupgrade / help

2018-02-02 Thread Denis Periša
Anyhow, I managed to do it. I booted new LEDE iniramfs kernel.. Then did ubiformat, ubiattach, ubimkvol on mtd6 ONLY, I labeled it "rootfs" mounted it, transfered rootfs.tar.gz and extracted.. then booted initramfs kernel of old openwrt and formatted mtd5 ONLY and only block device like mtd erase k

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Bad NAND my sysupgrade / help

2018-02-02 Thread Koen Vandeputte
On 2018-02-02 13:17, Denis Periša wrote: Anyhow, I managed to do it. I booted new LEDE iniramfs kernel.. Then did ubiformat, ubiattach, ubimkvol on mtd6 ONLY, I labeled it "rootfs" mounted it, transfered rootfs.tar.gz and extracted.. then booted initramfs kernel of old openwrt and formatted mtd

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] libubox: Don't warn about sign comparisons.

2018-02-02 Thread Karl Palsson
Rosen Penev wrote: > -Wsign-compare was breaking my builds when i disabled MIPS16 on > ramips (mt7621). Since this will probably not get fixed, > disable it. Given the fine tuned nature of all your prior commits, why are you now all of a sudden avoiding actually fixing the bad sign comparisons?

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/5] x86: add support for microcode update

2018-02-02 Thread Nick Lowe
Hi, There's a backport to GCC 5.5 here: https://github.com/hjl-tools/gcc/commits/hjl/indirect/gcc-5-branch/master Cheers, Nick ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] libubox: Don't warn about sign comparisons.

2018-02-02 Thread Rosen Penev
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:54 AM, Karl Palsson wrote: > > Rosen Penev wrote: >> -Wsign-compare was breaking my builds when i disabled MIPS16 on >> ramips (mt7621). Since this will probably not get fixed, >> disable it. > > Given the fine tuned nature of all your prior commits, why are > you now all

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] libubox: Don't warn about sign comparisons.

2018-02-02 Thread Karl Palsson
Rosen Penev wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:54 AM, Karl Palsson > wrote: > > > > Rosen Penev wrote: > >> -Wsign-compare was breaking my builds when i disabled MIPS16 on > >> ramips (mt7621). Since this will probably not get fixed, > >> disable it. > > > > Given the fine tuned nature of all yo

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/2] libubox: Don't warn about sign comparisons.

2018-02-02 Thread Rosen Penev
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Karl Palsson wrote: > > Rosen Penev wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:54 AM, Karl Palsson >> wrote: >> > >> > Rosen Penev wrote: >> >> -Wsign-compare was breaking my builds when i disabled MIPS16 on >> >> ramips (mt7621). Since this will probably not get fixed,

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] target: Remove nomips16 option.

2018-02-02 Thread Rosen Penev
There is no target with a CPU subtype of nomips16. Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev --- include/target.mk | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/target.mk b/include/target.mk index 0e52fb7..8ee197f 100644 --- a/include/target.mk +++ b/include/target.mk @@ -269,9

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Debugging steps for FS#1246 - Ubnt Nanostation Loco M2 - WDS link drops out after a few hours

2018-02-02 Thread Aaron Z
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Russell Senior wrote: > You could try not using WDS, maybe batman-adv instead. Tried that, got nowhere, a combination of the documentation not matching the results I got when entering commands and a general lack of documentation on it and on the best way to trouble