The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 02/11/2017 09:42, Philip Prind
hey Phillip,
On 02.11.2017 03:36, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Can someone else please try to reproduce this?
yes, not exactly but wrong resulting file name nonetheless. it's obviously a
bug. looks like a variable reuse went awry as it always hit's the second file,
having fragments of the first
On 10/26/2017 09:05 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Hannu Nyman writes:
>
>> Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
>>> + -
>>> + * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
>>> + * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall glass filled with
>>
Hi Hauke,
Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 10/26/2017 09:05 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
Hannu Nyman writes:
Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
+ -
+ * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
+ * 2 oz. Pineapple Juic
On 11/01/2017 12:15 PM, Hannu Nyman wrote:
> At the first glance LEDE r5217-098afa1e1b compiled with 1.1.18 booted ok and
> got normally a DHCP wan address, hostapd started etc..
Excuse me what?! "LEDE r5217-098afa1e1b"?
Why does that look like a "release 5217" and a SHA prefix "098afa1e1b"?
So
On 11/1/2017 5:18 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
This raises some more questions: which terms and conditions did people
have
to approve to get an @openwrt.org address? Where can these terms and
conditions be found? Is every email sent from such an address supposed to
be discussed and approved by the
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 4:24 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
>
> hey Phillip,
>
> On 02.11.2017 03:36, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Can someone else please try to reproduce this?
>
> yes, not exactly but wrong resulting file name nonetheless. it's obviously a
> bug. looks like a variable reuse wen
seems that ive lost my eth0 / eth1 interfeaces on a RECENT ... today
image built for the gw5520
i do however see the ifb0 and ifb1 interfaces... any ideas?
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo
From: Philip Prindeville
When uclient-fetch is called with multiple URL's, it derives the
first filename based on the URL. When it then handles the 2nd and
subsequent URLs, it assumes that it was called with a -O filename
argument as the output file, because it tries to overload the
variable outp
When using a PSK, with ft_psk_generate_local the PMK is
generate locally simplifing the configuration of 80211r.
With ft_over_ds support the user can now choose if use
FT over DS protocol or FT over the Air protocol.
Lorenzo Santina (2):
wifi: (80211r) add ft_psk_generate_local support
wifi:
From: Lorenzo Santina
If you are using PSK you can use ft_psk_generate_local
to simplify 80211r configuration.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Santina
---
.../luasrc/model/cbi/admin_network/wifi.lua| 32 --
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/mod
It's now possibile choose if use FT over DS
protocol or FT over the Air protocol for 80211r
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Santina
---
modules/luci-mod-admin-full/luasrc/model/cbi/admin_network/wifi.lua | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git
a/modules/luci-mod-admin-full/luasrc/model/c
Mike Baker wrote on 02.11.2017 16:59:
On 11/1/2017 5:18 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
This raises some more questions: which terms and conditions did people
have
to approve to get an @openwrt.org address? Where can these terms and
conditions be found? Is every email sent from such an address suppos
On 2017-11-02 19:23, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> From: Philip Prindeville
>
> When uclient-fetch is called with multiple URL's, it derives the
> first filename based on the URL. When it then handles the 2nd and
> subsequent URLs, it assumes that it was called with a -O filename
> argument as the
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
> On 2017-11-02 19:23, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> From: Philip Prindeville
>>
>> When uclient-fetch is called with multiple URL's, it derives the
>> first filename based on the URL. When it then handles the 2nd and
>> subsequent URLs, it a
On 2017-11-02 22:50, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>> On Nov 2, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-11-02 19:23, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> From: Philip Prindeville
>>>
>>> When uclient-fetch is called with multiple URL's, it derives the
>>> first filename based on the URL. W
Hi,
Zoltan HERPAI schrieb am 02.11.2017 um 13:20:
> For the sake of full transparency, Imre and me was not part of the vote,
> as that was sent to lede-adm, without including openwrt-hackers or
> openwrt-devel.
and your PATCH v2 didn't go to lede-adm.
a suggestion from a simple community member:
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 3:54 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
> On 2017-11-02 22:50, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>> Okay, great.
>>
>> When will this show up in LEDE?
> Pushed just now.
>
> - Felix
Tested and confirmed!
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-de
On 11/2/2017 1:44 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
I agree, that there were no warning signs on the public mailing list.
As I said before, all history now; discussing it further serves no purpose.
- Mike
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.or
19 matches
Mail list logo
