- Security: Fix double-free in server TCP listener cleanup A double-free
in the server could be triggered by an authenticated user if dropbear is
running with -a (Allow connections to forwarded ports from any host)
This could potentially allow arbitrary code execution as root by an
authenticated us
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> CVE-2018-9078 https://secure.ucc.asn.au/hg/dropbear/rev/c8114a48837c
2018? Early fix, I guess :-)
Bjørn
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
- Security: Fix double-free in server TCP listener cleanup A double-free
in the server could be triggered by an authenticated user if dropbear is
running with -a (Allow connections to forwarded ports from any host)
This could potentially allow arbitrary code execution as root by an
authenticated us
Hello,
On 05/20/2017 09:12 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about overlayfs and
> its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in combination with UBIFS is
> having a
> squashfs as lower and UBIFS as upper directory. Such that all ch
Florian,
Am 20.05.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/20/2017 09:12 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about overlayfs and
>> its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in combination with UBIFS is
>> having
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Paul Oranje wrote:
> When UCI dhcp.dnsmasq.noresolv is true, dnsmasq ignores the (wan) resolv.conf
> for upstream name resolution and the dnsmasq init script ialso skips writing
> /tmp/resolv.conf (/etc/resolv.conf soft links that file).
>
> Not using the local ru
On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:39:33 -0700
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/20/2017 09:12 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about
> > overlayfs and its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in
> > combination with UBIFS is
Ralph,
Am 20.05.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Ralph Sennhauser:
>>> These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about
>>> overlayfs and its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in
>>> combination with UBIFS is having a squashfs as lower and UBIFS as
>>> upper directory. Such that all chang
Hi Richard,
On Sat, 20 May 2017 21:57:36 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> Am 20.05.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Ralph Sennhauser:
> >>> These days I had an interesting discussion with Christoph about
> >>> overlayfs and its burden. The main use-case of overlayfs in
> >>> combination with U
Removes some undefined behavior.
Signed-off by: Rosen Penev
---
allocate.h| 10 +-
contents.c| 8
contents.h| 2 +-
extent.h | 2 +-
indirect.h| 2 +-
make_ext4fs.c | 12 ++--
6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/alloc
The master settings seem to be compatibility settings for Windows
98 and below. guest ok conflicts with the current UCI setup where
it gets applied to directories as well. Unfortunately, the global
setting takes precedence and nullifies the local ones. encrypt
passwords defaults to yes. No reason t
current LuCI defaults set the former for each individual share.
Patch is pending for the latter.
Signed-off by: Rosen Penev
---
package/network/services/samba36/files/smb.conf.template | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/network/services/samba36/files/smb.conf.template
12 matches
Mail list logo
