[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar8327: Add workarounds for AR8337 switch.

2017-03-25 Thread Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)
Backported from Code Aurora QSDK Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta --- .../linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8327.c | 43 +++- .../linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8327.h | 21 ++ 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/linu

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ag71xx: Fix rx ring buffer stall on small packets flood on qca956x and qca953x.

2017-03-25 Thread Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)
Backported from Code Aurora QSDK Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta --- .../linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/dev-eth.c |5 + .../mips/include/asm/mach-ath79/ag71xx_platform.h |2 +- .../net/ethernet/atheros/ag71xx/ag71xx_main.c | 16 3 files changed, 22 i

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: Add TP-LINK TL-WR841N v12 support.

2017-03-25 Thread Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)
This router has the same hardware of TP-LINK TL-WR841N v11 (same FCC ID, same TFTP image name...). The stock firmware web interface does not seem to accept the LEDE factory image, but it can be flashed via the u-boot TFTP recovery by long-pressing the reset button after power on. The TFTP image n

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: Add TP-LINK TL-WR841N v12 support.

2017-03-25 Thread Piotr Dymacz
Hello Vittorio, On 25.03.2017 18:08, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam) wrote: This router has the same hardware of TP-LINK TL-WR841N v11 (same FCC ID, same TFTP image name...). The stock firmware web interface does not seem to accept the LEDE factory image, but it can be flashed via the u-boot TFTP

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar8327: Add workarounds for AR8337 switch.

2017-03-25 Thread Mathias Kresin
25.03.2017 18:08, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam): Backported from Code Aurora QSDK Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta Please describe in the commit message what kind of issues need a workaround. Yes, I noticed the comments in the patch, but nevertheless it should go into the commit message.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] LEDE as hardware Load Balancer (a small router like a big-ip appliance)

2017-03-25 Thread Mauro Mozzarelli
OK I will wait to receive feedback on the actual software and I will collate all the changes (if any). I have been using this solution since February 2016 without issues, but I would like to hear from other users. Any comment on the actual Load Balancer package? Mauro On 24/03/17 22:48,