On 11/06/16 18:44, Dave Taht wrote:
happy to see cake working today! thx all!
In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10:
The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I
think) devices are not supported by it, and require a GPT capable
tool. Is there a replacement in le
On 11.06.2016 19:44, Dave Taht wrote:
> E) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/gdisk
>
> The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I
> think) devices are not supported by it, and require a GPT capable
> tool. Is there a replacement in lede that h
On 2016-06-11 08:37, Etienne CHAMPETIER wrote:
> This commit:
> 1) seed /dev/urandom with a saved seed as early as possible
>(using /lib/preinit/81_urandom_seed)
> 2) save a new seed using getrandom() so we are sure /dev/urandom
>pool is initialized (using /etc/init.d/urandom_seed)
>
> see
Hi Daniel,
I work on creating an OpenWrt image which I can just flash over an UGW
(Lantiq's/Intel's OpenWrt distribution) distribution with the normal
U-Boot. Then you do not have to touch the bootloader or the flash layout
and can just run OpenWrt. UGW is mostly focused on NAND flash based
device
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lars Kruse wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>> D) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/nanom5poe
>>
>> I don't know what landed upstream to control poe for the nano-m5
>> radios, if anything?
>
> I submitted a patch (that was accepted) for GPIO-based POE
Hi Hauke,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:23:58PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I work on creating an OpenWrt image which I can just flash over an UGW
> (Lantiq's/Intel's OpenWrt distribution) distribution with the normal
> U-Boot. Then you do not have to touch the bootloader or the fl
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> On 11/06/16 18:44, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> happy to see cake working today! thx all!
>>
>> In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10:
>> The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I
>> think) devices are not suppor
Hi Dave,
Am Sun, 12 Jun 2016 08:23:04 -0700
schrieb Dave Taht :
> Groovy. There are quite a few other devices that have POE (edgerouter
> is the first that comes to mind), perhaps this can be built on
> generically?
here should be the proper place (it was changed after my patch):
https://git.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I don't speak for the LEDE team, but it looks to me a lot of your
> problem is that you are using LEDE/openwrt for far bigger iron than the
> primary target (standard routers, including pre-AC non-NAND ones, which
> ar
Signed-off-by: Arne Zachlod
---
.../ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-ubnt-xm.c| 700 +
.../patches-4.4/607-MIPS-ath79-ubnt-xm-fixes.patch | 89 ---
.../608-MIPS-ath79-ubnt-xm-add-more-boards.patch | 623 +-
...IPS-ath79-UBNT-add-airGateway-pro-support.p
Much like the convention of prefixing your subject line with [PATCH]
messages like this should be required to have a prefix such as
[DRIVEL] for effective filtering
lede integration issues ??
I don't see why there IS an issue CeroWrt died for good reason(s) ... such as :
Low return on investment
Security fixes:
* Fixed port-share bug with DoS potential
* Fix buffer overflow by user supplied data
Full changelog:
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/ChangesInOpenvpn23#OpenVPN2.3.11
Signed-off-by: Magnus Kroken
---
package/network/services/openvpn/Makefile | 6 +++---
..
This commit:
1) seed /dev/urandom with a saved seed as early as possible
(using /lib/preinit/81_urandom_seed)
2) save a new seed using getrandom() so we are sure /dev/urandom
pool is initialized (using /etc/init.d/urandom_seed)
seed size is 512 bytes (ie /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize / 8)
Hi Felix,
2016-06-12 12:45 GMT+02:00 Felix Fietkau :
> On 2016-06-11 08:37, Etienne CHAMPETIER wrote:
>> This commit:
>> 1) seed /dev/urandom with a saved seed as early as possible
>>(using /lib/preinit/81_urandom_seed)
>> 2) save a new seed using getrandom() so we are sure /dev/urandom
>>
could it be that the subject is wrong s/images/names/ ?
John
On 11/06/2016 04:15, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
> ---
> tools/firmware-utils/src/mkfwimage2.c | 7 ++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/firmware-util
Hi Ian,
there is a typo in the subject and the description of the patch is
missing in the body. could you please fix those 2 things and resend the
patch ?
Johb
On 11/06/2016 15:54, Iain Fraser wrote:
> ---
> lua/ubus.c |5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
Hi,
comment inline.
On 10/06/2016 11:18, olivier.hardo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Move (previously hardcoded) mount option to UCI to allow different
> configuration
> like charset (utf-8 or iso) and filesystem driver (if alternative ones are
> used).
> The fs names are changed in lowercase to compl
17 matches
Mail list logo
