Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread John Crispin
On 05/05/2016 13:17, Bruno Randolf wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/05/16 11:05, John Crispin wrote: >>> We could also try to integrate this with some automated testing. > > Some automated way to do testing and submit the results would definetly > be good and preferable to a form-based webpage. Of course

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread Alexander Couzens
> It kinda makes sense, although it would be even nicer if the tests > were automated as well. That is something that Purple is working on. > There is a BoardFarm[1] test framework that is designed to test > routers and there could be created test suites that reflects some of > the criteria you des

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread Bruno Randolf
Hi, On 05/05/16 11:05, John Crispin wrote: >> We could also try to integrate this with some automated testing. Some automated way to do testing and submit the results would definetly be good and preferable to a form-based webpage. Of course basic stuff like "boots", "wifi worked", "leds worked" r

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread John Crispin
On 05/05/2016 11:47, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 05/05/2016 08:56 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow >> community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report >> the results some place. after some time thinking o

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 05/05/2016 08:56 AM, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow > community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report > the results some place. after some time thinking of different ways to do > this I came up with one po

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread Michal Hrusecky
John Crispin - 9:39 5.05.16 wrote: > > > On 05/05/2016 09:10, Michal Hrusecky wrote: > > John Crispin - 8:56 5.05.16 wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow > >> community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report > >> t

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread John Crispin
On 05/05/2016 09:10, Michal Hrusecky wrote: > John Crispin - 8:56 5.05.16 wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow >> community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report >> the results some place. after some time thinking of diff

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread David Lang
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Michal Hrusecky wrote: John Crispin - 8:56 5.05.16 wrote: Hi, It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report the results some place. after some time thinking of different ways to d

Re: getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-05 Thread Michal Hrusecky
John Crispin - 8:56 5.05.16 wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow > community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report > the results some place. after some time thinking of different ways to do > this I came up with one possible

getting users involved in on-device testing

2016-05-04 Thread John Crispin
Hi, It would be nice if there was a process in place that would allow community members to easily be able to test images on devices and report the results some place. after some time thinking of different ways to do this I came up with one possible solution and wanted to know what others think abo