Hi,
Am Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:12:53 -
schrieb Karl Palsson :
> [..]
> The life of the "service start|stop|status" really wasn't
> very long.
I just looked up the changelog of sysvinit-utils in Debian: this wrapper was
introduced in 2009. Seven years is not that bad, I guess.
Anyway: the wrapp
On 11/22/2016 11:12 AM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
>
> If it looks like debian and out of date unsupported
> centos/redhat, but is actually completely different, is it really
> helpful to make it look like something it's not?
>
Well, some secondary options (that can be added if someone thinks are
re
Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Alberto,
>
> personally I like the service wrapper since it alligns the
> service handling with Debian and older CentOS / Redhat distros.
If it looks like debian and out of date unsupported
centos/redhat, but is actually completely different, is it really
helpful to
On 22/11/2016 09:51, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Alberto,
>
> personally I like the service wrapper since it alligns the service
> handling with Debian and older CentOS / Redhat distros.
>
> In its current form though, the script is not providing enough
> functionality to justify its existence
Hi Alberto,
personally I like the service wrapper since it alligns the service
handling with Debian and older CentOS / Redhat distros.
In its current form though, the script is not providing enough
functionality to justify its existence since the same effect can be
achieved through an alias in /e
