Hi Daniel,
Please find my comments below.
On 04.02.2017 22:35, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Stas,
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:58:15PM +0300, Stanislav V. Korsakov wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Why do you think that all our TDMA-related modifications must be under
>> GPL license?
> As you are using cf
Hi Stas,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:58:15PM +0300, Stanislav V. Korsakov wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Why do you think that all our TDMA-related modifications must be under
> GPL license?
As you are using cfg80211 and mac80211 I just guessed that chances are
high that you'd also use ath9k and modifie
Hi Daniel,
Why do you think that all our TDMA-related modifications must be under
GPL license?
We use cfg80211, mac80211, ath5k and ath9k with very small modifications
to support new type of interface and to handle some new netlink commands.
We call own dual licensed module from mac80211 to handl
On 02/03/2017 11:40 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Stas,
>
> Obviously you could easily avoid that legal requirement by just not
> offering a free download of the binaries, so don't get me wrong, I
> do appreciate your openness! Yet, it'd be great if we had a shared
> codebase for TDMA instead of a
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi Alberto,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:59:38AM +, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 02/03/2017 07:35 AM, Stanislav V. Korsakov wrote:
Hi Daniel,
We provide our GPLed and dual licensed source codes to our customer only.
Not our source code is available at h
Hi Alberto,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:59:38AM +, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
> On 02/03/2017 07:35 AM, Stanislav V. Korsakov wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > We provide our GPLed and dual licensed source codes to our customer only.
> > Not our source code is available at http://gw.stasoft.net/dl/
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 02/03/2017 07:35 AM, Stanislav V. Korsakov wrote:
Hi Daniel,
We provide our GPLed and dual licensed source codes to our customer only.
Not our source code is available at http://gw.stasoft.net/dl/
What you wrote here sounds like a license violatio
On 02/03/2017 07:35 AM, Stanislav V. Korsakov wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> We provide our GPLed and dual licensed source codes to our customer only.
> Not our source code is available at http://gw.stasoft.net/dl/
>
What you wrote here sounds like a license violation.
Source code of GPLed software you
Hi Stas,
thanks for the quick reply!
I'm looking for a good way to replace ubiquiti's proprietary TDMA
implementation with something which could be vendor-independent and
interoperable -- and ideally Free Open Source Software.
As TDMA has been implemented for ath9k in FreeBSD, I was wondering if
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:35:30AM +0300, Stanislav V. Korsakov wrote:
> Please check this article http://netshe.ru/wirelessstack to understand
> layering of our modifications in Linux wireless stack.
"this module is a proprietary module broker"
Wow, that's a fancy name for it :D.
_
Hi Daniel,
Please check this article http://netshe.ru/wirelessstack to understand
layering of our modifications in Linux wireless stack. You can see that
we add proprietary licensed and dual licensed drivers in wireless stack.
We provide our GPLed and dual licensed source codes to our customer onl
11 matches
Mail list logo
