On 16-05-18 12:52 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
>> I was told in the past by one of founding LEDE team members (who shall
>> rename nameless unless he chooses to comment himself), that if I really
>> wanted to participate in OpenWrt community that I needed to be on IRC
>> (in a private mail to me).
On 18/05/2016 03:10, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
> On 16-05-17 05:22 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> well that is status quo, IRC is used to discuss real time stuff and give
>> user support.
>>
>> all other stuff is on the list. meetings being the only thing still on
>> IRC due to lack of better op
On 16-05-17 05:22 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> well that is status quo, IRC is used to discuss real time stuff and give
> user support.
>
> all other stuff is on the list. meetings being the only thing still on
> IRC due to lack of better options right now. meetings are however held
> late during EU
Fully agree.
Fernando
On 17 May 2016 at 06:02, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On 17/05/16 09:46, andrew wrote:
>> How about something like rocket.chat or one of the opensource self
>> hosted alternatives?
>
> Don't get me wrong, the problem is not IRC itself, there are definetly
> good uses for it. I'm
On 17/05/2016 11:02, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On 17/05/16 09:46, andrew wrote:
>> How about something like rocket.chat or one of the opensource self
>> hosted alternatives?
>
> Don't get me wrong, the problem is not IRC itself, there are definetly
> good uses for it. I'm NOT saying people should n
On 17/05/16 09:46, andrew wrote:
> How about something like rocket.chat or one of the opensource self
> hosted alternatives?
Don't get me wrong, the problem is not IRC itself, there are definetly
good uses for it. I'm NOT saying people should not use IRC to
coordinate. My point is: hanging out (as
How about something like rocket.chat or one of the opensource self
hosted alternatives?
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 17:29 -0400, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
> On 16-05-16 05:18 PM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
> >
> > The objective is so that you don't have isolated pools of TZ's
> > where one
> >
On 05/16/2016 03:42 PM, Aaron Z wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Maybe get an IRC bot to dump irc logs to the mailing list every few
hours? Might be a bit spammy though
IMO, trying to follow IRC when its not realtime (ie: reading a log)
makes it somewhat difficult
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Maybe get an IRC bot to dump irc logs to the mailing list every few
> hours? Might be a bit spammy though
IMO, trying to follow IRC when its not realtime (ie: reading a log)
makes it somewhat difficult to follow threads of conversations (wh
Maybe get an IRC bot to dump irc logs to the mailing list every few
hours? Might be a bit spammy though
Ben
On 05/16/2016 12:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
znc and bitlbee are godsends when using irc asynchronously.
In particular I feed all irc convos into bitlbee and then into erc on
emacs (so
On 16-05-16 05:18 PM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
> The objective is so that you don't have isolated pools of TZ's where one
> TZ has little insight into what the other TZ is doing and has no *good*
> mechanisms for communicating across timezones.
>
> Reading IRC chat logs is an exercise is pai
On 16-05-16 03:29 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> the voting does not effect the actual coding work. it more relates to
> infrastructure, political and release related decisions. i think we are
> talking about the day 2 day interaction here.
>
> what i dont get is how emails vs irc would resolve the
On 16/05/2016 21:25, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-05-16 21:14, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>> On 16/05/16 20:08, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> znc and bitlbee are godsends when using irc asynchronously.
>>>
>>> In particular I feed all irc convos into bitlbee and then into erc on
>>> emacs (so I am not hurt wh
On 2016-05-16 21:14, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On 16/05/16 20:08, Dave Taht wrote:
>> znc and bitlbee are godsends when using irc asynchronously.
>>
>> In particular I feed all irc convos into bitlbee and then into erc on
>> emacs (so I am not hurt when my connection goes away).
>
> Well, thanks for
On 16/05/16 20:08, Dave Taht wrote:
> znc and bitlbee are godsends when using irc asynchronously.
>
> In particular I feed all irc convos into bitlbee and then into erc on
> emacs (so I am not hurt when my connection goes away).
Well, thanks for the hints, but please just accept the fact that IRC
znc and bitlbee are godsends when using irc asynchronously.
In particular I feed all irc convos into bitlbee and then into erc on
emacs (so I am not hurt when my connection goes away).
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:00 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 12:46 +0100, Bruno Randolf wr
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 12:46 +0100, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On 15/05/16 05:53, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> >
> > I'd really appreciate if we could actually use the mailing list for the
> > main communications venue rather than shutting out people not in the
> > European timezones, which is what happen
On 15/05/16 05:53, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I'd really appreciate if we could actually use the mailing list for the
> main communications venue rather than shutting out people not in the
> European timezones, which is what happens if IRC is the main way to
> participate in the community.
>
> I ha
18 matches
Mail list logo
