Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: use SIGUSR2 for dnssec time valid

2018-01-09 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> On 5 Jan 2018, at 11:10, Karl Palsson wrote: > > > The freshly released busybox 1.28 has a number of DNS related > fixes for NTP btw. > > ntpd: do run the script at least once in 11 minutes > ntpd: improve treatment of DNS resolution failures > ntpd: mention in help text that

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: use SIGUSR2 for dnssec time valid

2018-01-05 Thread Karl Palsson
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > I don’t have a magic patch for this problem. It seems to me > that ideally busybox ntpd shouldn’t serve time until it has > sync’d. A horrible hack idea: firewall rule to drop incoming > ntp requests from clients… have an ntpd hotplug script that > captures the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: use SIGUSR2 for dnssec time valid

2018-01-05 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> On 5 Jan 2018, at 08:22, e9hack wrote: > > Am 02.01.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant: >> Move 'check dnssec timestamp enable' from SIGHUP handler to SIGUSR2. > > Hi, > > your patch fixes the DNS problem for me. Good, as I suspected it would. > > Now I get another ugly behaviou

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: use SIGUSR2 for dnssec time valid

2018-01-05 Thread e9hack
Am 02.01.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant: > Move 'check dnssec timestamp enable' from SIGHUP handler to SIGUSR2. Hi, your patch fixes the DNS problem for me. Now I get another ugly behaviour which is more related to ntpd from busybox. Ntpd answers to ntp request before it did upda