On 2018-02-19 11:47, Andrey Jr. Melnikov wrote:
Koen Vandeputte wrote:
The current implementation only checked if uqmi itself executed
correctly which is also the case when the returned value is actually
an error.
Rework this, checking that CID is a numeric value, which can only
be true if uq
Koen Vandeputte wrote:
> The current implementation only checked if uqmi itself executed
> correctly which is also the case when the returned value is actually
> an error.
> Rework this, checking that CID is a numeric value, which can only
> be true if uqmi itself also executed correctly.
Why ig
