Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] uloop: make SIGCHLD signal handling optional

2017-09-29 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2017-09-29 13:35, Petar Paradzik wrote: > It is already present (in the master), but not used. You're right. Will merge this patch. Thanks, - Felix ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/le

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] uloop: make SIGCHLD signal handling optional

2017-09-29 Thread Petar Paradzik
It is already present (in the master), but not used. Regards, Petar On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-07-03 13:37, Petar Paradzik wrote: >> Some programs want to manage their own child life cycle without using >> SIGCHLD signal handler. In these cases, uloop is rea

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] uloop: make SIGCHLD signal handling optional

2017-09-29 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2017-07-03 13:37, Petar Paradzik wrote: > Some programs want to manage their own child life cycle without using > SIGCHLD signal handler. In these cases, uloop is reaping children for > them because they don't have SIGCHLD handler set. This patch makes it > possible to disable reaping children t