o:j...@phrozen.org]
> Sent: donderdag 29 september 2016 7:43
> To: Lebleu Pierre ;
> lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] The procd daemon does not handle correctly the
> instances
>
> this might actually be solvable int he scripts, will need to take a closer
t; rather than "set" when we specify the
instance.
Pierre
-Original Message-
From: John Crispin [mailto:j...@phrozen.org]
Sent: donderdag 29 september 2016 7:43
To: Lebleu Pierre ; lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] The procd daemon does not handle correctly the
44
>> --- a/package/system/procd/files/procd.sh
>> +++ b/package/system/procd/files/procd.sh
>> @@ -72,11 +72,15 @@ _procd_open_service() {
>> }
>>
>> _procd_close_service() {
>> + local method="set"
>> + [ -n "$1" ] &am
_trigger
> - _procd_ubus_call set
> +
> + _procd_ubus_call $method
> }
>
> _procd_add_array_data() {
>
>
> With this patch, it seems to work.
>
> Pierre
> -Original Message-
> From: John Crispin [mailto:j...@phrozen.org]
> Sent: di
_procd_ubus_call set
+
+ _procd_ubus_call $method
}
_procd_add_array_data() {
With this patch, it seems to work.
Pierre
-Original Message-----
From: John Crispin [mailto:j...@phrozen.org]
Sent: dinsdag 27 september 2016 17:48
To: Lebleu Pierre ; lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Sub
On 27/09/2016 17:34, Lebleu Pierre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found a bug in the daemon process management. Indeed, when we have several
> instances of one daemon such as "dnsmasq" and we want to restart only one
> instance, the other instance is killed by procd. It seems procd updates the
> seco
Hi all,
I found a bug in the daemon process management. Indeed, when we have several
instances of one daemon such as "dnsmasq" and we want to restart only one
instance, the other instance is killed by procd. It seems procd updates the
second instance and then, kill it.
Please find the patch :
