Hi,
As an opposite example, ar71xx 74Kc CPUs such as Atheros AR934x currently
run 34Kc (so 24Kc) code. Would a separate 74Kc subtarget make sense there?
On 22/08/2016 11:03:54 CEST, Jonas Gorski wrote:
But of course if benchmarks show that 74k won't reduce performance on
24k/34k/1004k, we can c
Hi Daniel,
On 22 August 2016 at 08:34, Daniel Engberg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before going all in switching to 24kc, 74kc seems to use a different code
> path and looking at datasheets 1004kc seems more similar to 74kc than 24kc.
I'm not sure how you came to this conclusion:
24kc has a 8-stage pipelin
Hi,
Before going all in switching to 24kc, 74kc seems to use a different
code path and looking at datasheets 1004kc seems more similar to 74kc
than 24kc. Please benchmark the impact between 74kc and 24kc on 1004kc
and possibly on 74kc devices before blindly(?) switching.
http://code.metager.
