Re: [LEDE-DEV] Question regarding kmod-ipt-offload and imagebuilder

2018-03-30 Thread Koen Vandeputte
On 2018-03-29 16:14, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2018-03-29 13:42, Koen Vandeputte wrote: Hi Felix, Regarding your commit ("build: include kmod-ipt-offload in default images") [1] By default, this package is only supported (and selectable) when the target device uses kernel 4.14. I've just tri

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Question regarding kmod-ipt-offload and imagebuilder

2018-03-29 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2018-03-29 13:42, Koen Vandeputte wrote: > Hi Felix, > > Regarding your commit ("build: include kmod-ipt-offload in default > images") [1] > > By default, this package is only supported (and selectable) when the > target device uses kernel 4.14. > > > I've just tried this: > > - Checkout

[LEDE-DEV] Question regarding kmod-ipt-offload and imagebuilder

2018-03-29 Thread Koen Vandeputte
Hi Felix, Regarding your commit ("build: include kmod-ipt-offload in default images") [1] By default, this package is only supported (and selectable) when the target device uses kernel 4.14. I've just tried this: - Checkout OpenWrt master - Select a target using kernel 4.9 (ar71xx) - Buil

[LEDE-DEV] Question of replacing mountd with blockd

2017-12-25 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Hi, looking at: commit 7e4b869c45138 ("fstools: add blockd") commit 6a772cb953c4c ("mountd: drop in favour of blockd") I'd expect blockd to provide the same functionality as mountd did. I don't think it's the case though. With mountd installed (e.g. in LEDE 17.01) plugging in USB storage device w

[LEDE-DEV] QUESTION

2017-10-20 Thread Rachel Stinson
Hi, I was just dropping in a quick line to know, if I could send some great article ideas your way for a guest post at your website lede-project.org ? If you like my suggested ideas, I can then provide you high-quality FREE CONTENT/ARTICLE. In return, I would expect just a favor of a backlink

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Question regarding wan6 interface defaults

2017-05-30 Thread Hans Dedecker
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Sear list, dear Hans, > > CONTEXT: > As described in > https://forum.lede-project.org/t/build-for-wndr3700v1-v2-wndr3800/64/56?u=moeller0 > I had issues with using IPv6 and IPv4 DNS on my home network (deutsche > Telekom, vdsl2 @BRAS

[LEDE-DEV] Question regarding wan6 interface defaults

2017-05-29 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Sear list, dear Hans, CONTEXT: As described in https://forum.lede-project.org/t/build-for-wndr3700v1-v2-wndr3800/64/56?u=moeller0 I had issues with using IPv6 and IPv4 DNS on my home network (deutsche Telekom, vdsl2 @BRAS link). The main symptoms were, that a) IPv6 did not work, and b) DNS eve

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [question] gpg signature validation of source package

2017-05-11 Thread Alif M. A.
On 11/05/2017 14:27, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-05-11 09:16, Alif M. A. wrote: >> I am preparing for grub-2.02 package upgrade. >> >> The download mirror provides a gpg signature (.sig file), which can be >> used to validate the source package. >> >> Does LEDE build system have a way to verify

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [question] gpg signature validation of source package

2017-05-11 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2017-05-11 09:16, Alif M. A. wrote: > I am preparing for grub-2.02 package upgrade. > > The download mirror provides a gpg signature (.sig file), which can be > used to validate the source package. > > Does LEDE build system have a way to verify source package using gpg > signature? I'd rather

[LEDE-DEV] [question] gpg signature validation of source package

2017-05-11 Thread Alif M. A.
I am preparing for grub-2.02 package upgrade. The download mirror provides a gpg signature (.sig file), which can be used to validate the source package. Does LEDE build system have a way to verify source package using gpg signature? I'd rather use gpg verification if possible, rather than checks

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Question about rpcd uci::state

2017-03-06 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, my plan was to add a boolean option to the "get" procedure which - if set - will temporarely switch the savedir to an invalid path (like /dev/null), then switch it back to the previous value. The rpcd daemon currently switches the savedir per session/call anyway so it should be a minor chang

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Question about rpcd uci::state

2017-03-06 Thread Zefir Kurtisi
On 03/06/2017 01:15 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi, > >> the uci ubus service (part of rpcd) provides the method 'state' which from >> reading >> the source code is expected to provide the current state of an option >> ignoring >> pending changes. > > No it is a method to provide access to the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Question about rpcd uci::state

2017-03-06 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, > the uci ubus service (part of rpcd) provides the method 'state' which from > reading > the source code is expected to provide the current state of an option ignoring > pending changes. No it is a method to provide access to the legacy concept of "state variables" which are epheramal uci va

[LEDE-DEV] Question about rpcd uci::state

2017-03-06 Thread Zefir Kurtisi
Hi Jo, all, the uci ubus service (part of rpcd) provides the method 'state' which from reading the source code is expected to provide the current state of an option ignoring pending changes. At my side it does not (shows the same as 'get'): > root@LEDE:~# ubus call uci get '{"config":"system", "