On 4 November 2016 at 10:14, liudengf...@kunteng.org
wrote:
> Hi, Rafal
> I am confused by "please don't drop mailing list when replying", which
> means I should cc LEDE Development List or
> not?
1) Yes, you should Cc mailing list
2) You *shouldn't* send HTML e-mails, we don't like that
__
On 4 November 2016 at 03:51, Ben Greear wrote:
> I don't really have time to work specifically on LEDE much.
>
> But, if someone else takes care of the rest, then my firmware
> can hopefully work well on its radio.
liudengfeng please don't drop mailing list when replying
--
Rafał
_
ailto:liudengf...@kunteng.org>; LEDE Development
List <mailto:lede-dev@lists.infradead.org>
*Subject:* Re: [LEDE-DEV] New CT ath10k firmware is available
The 10.4 firmware supports 9984. It is one of the chips I test against.
But, I am using it as a NIC in an x86-64 platform,
adead.org>
*Subject:* [LEDE-DEV] New CT ath10k firmware is available
For those of you using my 10.1 or 10.4 CT ath10k firmware in LEDE, I have
pushed new beta
builds for all of the various images I build.
For those with capability and time, it would help me out if you could
For those of you using my 10.1 or 10.4 CT ath10k firmware in LEDE, I have
pushed new beta
builds for all of the various images I build.
For those with capability and time, it would help me out if you could do a bit
of
testing of these firmware on LEDE. If I can get some successful reports, I w
