On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Mats Karrman wrote:
>
> On 2016-06-15 15:16, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-06-15 15:13, Hans Dedecker wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at
>> 11:58 AM, Felix Fietkau >>
>
> wrote: >>> On 2016-06-15 11:39, Conor O'Gorman wrote: On 09/06/16
> 03:20, Yousong
On 2016-06-15 16:54, Mats Karrman wrote:
> Ran 118 reboots with this fix without any problem so there is a good
> chance that
> the latest version of libubox (c2f2c47f3e9a2d709ec82a79f6fadd3124c18781)
> finally fixed the issue.
> :-) // Mats
Pushed out the update to the LEDE tree, thanks for testi
On 2016-06-15 15:16, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-06-15 15:13, Hans Dedecker wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Felix Fietkau >>
wrote: >>> On 2016-06-15 11:39, Conor O'Gorman wrote: On 09/06/16
03:20, Yousong Zhou wrote: > Fix a race condition when do_sigchld,
uloop_cancel
rg
> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] uloop: use a waker for notifying
> sigchld and loop cancel events
> Message-ID: <5761530d.6010...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
>
> On 2016-06-15 13:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
On 2016-06-15 15:13, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-06-15 11:39, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
>>> On 09/06/16 03:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), r
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-06-15 11:39, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
>> On 09/06/16 03:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>>> Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
>>> before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), resulting the loop stuck in the syscall
>>> witho
On 2016-06-15 13:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
On 15 June 2016 at 17:58, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-06-09 04:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), resulting the loop stuck in the syscall
without noticing the even
On 15 June 2016 at 17:58, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-06-09 04:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>> Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
>> before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), resulting the loop stuck in the syscall
>> without noticing the events just happened
>>
>> Signed-off-b
On 2016-06-15 11:39, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
> On 09/06/16 03:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>> Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
>> before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), resulting the loop stuck in the syscall
>> without noticing the events just happened
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yous
On 2016-06-09 04:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
> before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), resulting the loop stuck in the syscall
> without noticing the events just happened
>
> Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
I found a few bugs and inconsistencie
On 09/06/16 03:20, Yousong Zhou wrote:
Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), resulting the loop stuck in the syscall
without noticing the events just happened
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
---
uloop-epoll.c | 2 +-
uloop-kqueue.c |
Fix a race condition when do_sigchld, uloop_cancelled were set just
before epoll_wait(timeout=-1), resulting the loop stuck in the syscall
without noticing the events just happened
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
---
uloop-epoll.c | 2 +-
uloop-kqueue.c | 2 +-
uloop.c| 65 +++
12 matches
Mail list logo
