On 20 August 2016 at 21:21, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 17/08/2016 à 23:06, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
>> On 17 August 2016 at 12:28, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>>> On 16 August 2016 at 16:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
On all devices suppored so far BCM53125 got port 8 conn
Le 17/08/2016 à 23:06, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
> On 17 August 2016 at 12:28, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> On 16 August 2016 at 16:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>>
>>> On all devices suppored so far BCM53125 got port 8 connected to the SoC
>>> interface and ports 0-4 to physical por
On 17 August 2016 at 12:28, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 16 August 2016 at 16:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>
>> On all devices suppored so far BCM53125 got port 8 connected to the SoC
>> interface and ports 0-4 to physical ports. On BCM53573 there is slightly
>> more comlex setup
Hi,
On 16 August 2016 at 16:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> On all devices suppored so far BCM53125 got port 8 connected to the SoC
> interface and ports 0-4 to physical ports. On BCM53573 there is slightly
> more comlex setup. We have 2 SoC interfaces: one (eth0) connected to
From: Rafał Miłecki
On all devices suppored so far BCM53125 got port 8 connected to the SoC
interface and ports 0-4 to physical ports. On BCM53573 there is slightly
more comlex setup. We have 2 SoC interfaces: one (eth0) connected to
port 8 and another (eth1) connected to port 5. This change allo
