Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] iproute2: Add support for ports in xfrm on SCTP

2018-02-18 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 02/18/2018 07:29 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Why did we even do this to begin with? That is a good question. ;-) My assumption is that about 13 years ago uClibc did not provide the IPPROTO_SCTP define and this is still a workaround for this problem. I haven't checked the uClibc code. Commit

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] iproute2: Add support for ports in xfrm on SCTP

2018-02-18 Thread Philip Prindeville
Why did we even do this to begin with? > On Feb 15, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > Remove this old patch which prevents showing the xfrm ports for SCTP > > This was added in commit 60c1f0f64d23 ("finally move buildroot-ng to trunk") > --- > .../network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-n

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] iproute2: Add support for ports in xfrm on SCTP

2018-02-15 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
Remove this old patch which prevents showing the xfrm ports for SCTP This was added in commit 60c1f0f64d23 ("finally move buildroot-ng to trunk") --- .../network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-no_sctp.patch | 18 -- 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 package/network