Hi
On 2016-08-18, Karl Palsson wrote:
> Why not just add sha256 sum rather than going back to md5?
[...]
Generating md5sums in addition to sha256sums files only affects build
time slightly, but doesn't increase the firmware size itself. Given
that apparently nothing currently requires a sha256su
Why not just add sha256 sum rather than going back to md5?
Cheers,
Karl P
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Commit 83175687c81bee594885d0738cfd488673f5a3fb "build: remove
> image specific checksum code" dropped the generation of md5
> checksums in favour of only shipping sha256 ones.
>
> A defa
Commit 83175687c81bee594885d0738cfd488673f5a3fb "build: remove image
specific checksum code" dropped the generation of md5 checksums in
favour of only shipping sha256 ones.
A default Lede installation however doesn't enable busybox' sha256sum
applet, which makes confirming the checksum on the devi
