Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-10 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 10 May 2016, Bruno Randolf wrote: On 10/05/16 09:33, Hannu Nyman wrote: The contents of those files, the related config options and the sources for each items might maybe be rationalised at the same time. Good idea. I think most of this can be beautifully handled by using git tags an

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-10 Thread Christian Huldt
Den 2016-05-10 kl. 11:52, skrev Bruno Randolf: >> On 10/05/16 09:33, Hannu Nyman wrote: >> * branch builds after a release: Branch codename designation, last >> > release number known + changes after it, source revision, opkg download >> > from last release repo > Would automatically happen as expl

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-10 Thread Bruno Randolf
On 10/05/16 09:33, Hannu Nyman wrote: > The contents of those files, the related config options and the sources > for each items might maybe be rationalised at the same time. Good idea. I think most of this can be beautifully handled by using git tags and "git describe". Basically the simple idea

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-10 Thread Hannu Nyman
On 8.5.2016 7:35, John Crispin wrote: On 06/05/2016 02:16, l...@daniel.thecshore.com wrote: package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_release | 7 -- package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_version | 1 - these 2 files cannot simply be removed as that would break luci. we need to eit

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-07 Thread John Crispin
On 08/05/2016 07:19, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > Also, as I mentioned in the preface (not sure if you saw), this patch > was intended to point things out for whoever does the actual patch > rather than as the patch that goes in. > > Feel free to make any changes you feel necessary. > > Regards, >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-07 Thread Daniel Dickinson
Also, as I mentioned in the preface (not sure if you saw), this patch was intended to point things out for whoever does the actual patch rather than as the patch that goes in. Feel free to make any changes you feel necessary. Regards, Daniel ___ Lede-

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-07 Thread John Crispin
On 08/05/2016 07:07, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On 16-05-08 12:35 AM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 06/05/2016 02:16, l...@daniel.thecshore.com wrote: >>> package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_release | 7 -- >>> package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_version | 1 - >> >> >> these 2

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-07 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On 16-05-08 12:35 AM, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 06/05/2016 02:16, l...@daniel.thecshore.com wrote: >> package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_release | 7 -- >> package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_version | 1 - > > > these 2 files cannot simply be removed as that would break l

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-07 Thread John Crispin
On 06/05/2016 02:16, l...@daniel.thecshore.com wrote: > package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_release | 7 -- > package/base-files/files/etc/openwrt_version | 1 - these 2 files cannot simply be removed as that would break luci. we need to either create symlinks or teach luci to

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] More OpenWrt -> LEDE renames

2016-05-06 Thread lede
From: Daniel Dickinson Branding: Rename openwrt to lede where appropriate (although probably some unnecessary changes were made due to not looking all that closely and doing a relatively mindless (but not automatic) search and replace). Probably this commit is incomplete and also has some things