On 19 January 2018 at 05:19, Karl Palsson wrote:
>> But I would not worry about making the lives of contributors
>> easier [since they come & go]. I would worry about making the
>> lives of core devs easier, since their number is rarely
>> changing, and they have to put in the effort.
>
> An examp
> But I would not worry about making the lives of contributors
> easier [since they come & go]. I would worry about making the
> lives of core devs easier, since their number is rarely
> changing, and they have to put in the effort.
An example of wording you may wish to re-examine. This is exactly
>
> I started working on a script, here is how it works. its pretty
> much the same for patchwork and github with the difference that
> on github we write comments and patchwork we send mails. after
> 90 days we send a note saying "it stalled pleases remind folks
> and help get it merged" after 12
Hi Val,
On 19.01.2018 02:02, Val Kulkov wrote:
On 18 January 2018 at 19:49, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 01/19/2018 01:05 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
There is more than a handful of PRs currently bit-rotting in
openwrt/packages that are ready for merging, with all requested
changes in place since ma
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:09 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 19/01/18 08:55, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:02 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 January 2018 at 19:49, Alberto Bursi
>>> wrote:
On 01/19/2018 01:05 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
>
On 19/01/18 08:55, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:02 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
On 18 January 2018 at 19:49, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 01/19/2018 01:05 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
There is more than a handful of PRs currently bit-rotting in
openwrt/packages that are ready for mer
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:02 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
> On 18 January 2018 at 19:49, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/19/2018 01:05 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
>>>
>>> There is more than a handful of PRs currently bit-rotting in
>>> openwrt/packages that are ready for merging, with all requested
>>>
On 18 January 2018 at 19:49, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/19/2018 01:05 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
>>
>> There is more than a handful of PRs currently bit-rotting in
>> openwrt/packages that are ready for merging, with all requested
>> changes in place since many months ago. Auto-closing such PRs
On 01/19/2018 01:05 AM, Val Kulkov wrote:
There is more than a handful of PRs currently bit-rotting in
openwrt/packages that are ready for merging, with all requested
changes in place since many months ago. Auto-closing such PRs will
offend the contributors who would see their effort go down th
On 18 January 2018 at 03:44, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi John, Alex,
>
> I have no problem with closing / autorejecting open tickets in patchwork
> as long as they somehow remain available for future reference.
>
>> To add here. Would it be possible/desire-able to add an auto-timeout
>> to patchwo
Hi All,
2018-01-18 1:30 GMT-08:00 Piotr Dymacz :
> Hi,
>
> On 18.01.2018 09:44, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>
>> Hi John, Alex,
>>
>> I have no problem with closing / autorejecting open tickets in patchwork
>> as long as they somehow remain available for future reference.
>
>
> ACK.
>
> Would it be po
11 matches
Mail list logo
