Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

2018-04-09 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 2018-04-01 17:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will not be included in the next release. The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be incl

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

2018-04-01 Thread Alexandru Ardelean
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending > on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14 > will not be included in the next release. > > I did some overview of the kernel version some mon

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:41 PM, John Crispin wrote: > please dont top post. Apologies! Thank you for the kind reminder. > ath79 is the same as ar71xx but uses dts files instead of mach files Right, does that mean there might be an ath79 target, which is not ready yet, or am I confusing things?

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread John Crispin
On 19/02/18 13:54, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: Hi John, As a user of an ar71xx (WNDR3800) on OpenWrt, I'd like to ask if your desire is that ar71xx never gets bumped up to anything higher than 4.9 or it's just not 4.14 because of some specific reasons related to 4.14? IOW, shall I be looking f

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 2018-02-19 12:42, Karl Palsson wrote: Hauke Mehrtens wrote: The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be included in the next release: * gemini This is a platform that upstream seems to be actually working on, would it not be at least polite to keep it alive while it's

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread Karl Palsson
Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not > be included in the next release: > * gemini This is a platform that upstream seems to be actually working on, would it not be at least polite to keep it alive while it's landing in mainline? I don't have any