Hi,
> > - https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/539
> > Add TL-WA901v5 support
>
> The GCC 7 patches are probably already in, but the target commit looks
> ok to me, but I am not a ar71xx expert.
Yesterday, I came across a TL-WA901v5 and did a PR on LEDE github, without
knowing that
someone
Hi Mathias,
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Mathias Kresin wrote:
22.10.2017 22:56, Hauke Mehrtens:
On 10/22/2017 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hi,
- https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/312
ar71xx: add support for Zsun WiFi SD Card Reader
This is missing a Singed-of-by line
A few days ago a
22.10.2017 22:56, Hauke Mehrtens:
On 10/22/2017 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hi,
Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hi Hauke,
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git
repository into the LEDE repository.
Here is a list of all non merge
On 10/22/2017 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
>> Hi Hauke,
>>
>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>
>>> I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git
>>> repository into the LEDE repository.
>>>
>>> Here is a list of all non merge commits
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hauke,
>>
>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>
>>> I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git
>>> repository into the LEDE repository.
>>>
>>> Here is a list of all no
Hi,
Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hi Hauke,
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git
repository into the LEDE repository.
Here is a list of all non merge commits from the OpenWrt git repository
and their corresponding LEDE commit IDs:
On 10/22/2017 11:46 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on merging the missing commits from the OpenWrt git
> repository into the LEDE repository.
>
> Here is a list of all non merge commits from the OpenWrt git repository
> and their corresponding LEDE commit IDs:
> https://github
Dear Kathy,
> I appreciate your well-written summary and the notable improvements.
> Moving to git and keeping history, improving the web site and
> documentation to enable more collaboration, making workflows more
> efficient and open, etc. had been discussed during face-to-face
> gatherings of O
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be
> summarized as:
>
> - Launching the new LEDE project/fork/reboot without discussing
>matters in advance with the developers not being involved was
>
Hi all,
I think the status quo has now been described several times and can be
summarized as:
- Launching the new LEDE project/fork/reboot without discussing
matters in advance with the developers not being involved was
perceived in a hostile action damaging OpenWrt
- It has been claimed
On 25 May 2016 at 10:09, mbm wrote:
> The hackers email address represents the primary point of contact for
> OpenWrt, particularly in regards to donations. Following the surprise LEDE
> announcement, forwarding rules for @openwrt.org email addresses were
> disabled. This was done to mitigate furt
mbm writes:
> The hackers email address represents the primary point of contact for
> OpenWrt, particularly in regards to donations. Following the surprise
> LEDE announcement, forwarding rules for @openwrt.org email addresses
> were disabled. This was done to mitigate further damage to OpenWrt d
Zoltan HERPAI writes:
>> On 05/24/2016 10:31 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>
>> This is my personal opinion and this was not somehow internally planned
>> with other LEDE people.
>
> If I start a discussion about my employer-related topics along a beer
> with a couple friends, that's a private discus
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 23:57 +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
[snip]
> Hi,
> >> I would like to see a reunion of LEDE and OpenWrt, so do any of the non
> >> LEDE but OpenWrt core devs have any problems with the LEDE rules and so on?
> >>
> > This is my personal opinion and this was not somehow internal
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 23:57 +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
[snip]
> Hi,
> >> I would like to see a reunion of LEDE and OpenWrt, so do any of the non
> >> LEDE but OpenWrt core devs have any problems with the LEDE rules and so on?
> >>
> > This is my personal opinion and this was not somehow internall
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 23:57 +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
[snip]
> Hi,
> >> I would like to see a reunion of LEDE and OpenWrt, so do any of the non
> >> LEDE but OpenWrt core devs have any problems with the LEDE rules and so on?
> >>
> > This is my personal opinion and this was not somehow internal
Hi,
On 05/24/2016 10:31 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big
interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding
a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow.
The point you are missing is that som
On 24 May 2016 at 22:31, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big
> interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding
> a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow.
>
> Currently it looks like only Luka i
add lede-dev
On 05/24/2016 10:31 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it looks like the IRC meeting will not happen, because not so big
> interest by the people not already involved in LEDE and problems finding
> a time, lets discuss on the mailing list like suggested by Jow.
>
> Currently it
19 matches
Mail list logo
