On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 03:43 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote:
>
> > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by
> > Felix,
> > Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. As a next
> > step, we recommend to organiz
David Lang wrote:
> I wasn't questioning why it's useful to support TR-069. The only part I was
> questioning was the statement that OpenWRT needed work to make it
> support remote management.
>
> There are already many tools to remotely manage/monitor OpenWRT
>
> But that's why I'm saying that
On Sat, 28 May 2016, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 05/27/2016 12:43 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote:
We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by
Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing"
proposals. As a next step, we recomme
On 05/27/2016 12:43 PM, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote:
>
>> We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by
>> Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing"
>> proposals. As a next step, we recommend to organize a workshop, at a
>>
Hi Karl,
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> David Lang wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote:
>>
>> > We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by
>> > Felix,
>> > Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. As a nex
