Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC PATCH] tools/squashfs: change to upstream and update to new version 5.0-rc1

2017-07-11 Thread Phillip Lougher
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Alexander Couzens wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 18:03:26 +0200 > Alexander Couzens wrote: > >> Hi Phillip, >> >> nice to hear you're still there! >> >> There was no offense meant in my patch, I just couldn't reach you >> via email nor did anybody respond to patches

[LEDE-DEV] [RFC PATCH] tools/squashfs: change to upstream and update to new version 5.0-rc1

2017-05-28 Thread Phillip Lougher
On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote: > squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major > distributions are integrated. >include/image.mk | 3 +- >tools/squashfs4/Makefile | 12 +- >tools/squashfs4/patches/100-p

[LEDE-DEV] [RFC PATCH] tools/squashfs: change to upstream and update to new version 5.0-rc1

2017-05-28 Thread Phillip Lougher
L:=https://github.com/lynxis/squashfs-tools.git That is a fork of my repository. By all means use an unofficial fork, but, make that clear in your documentation. Thanks Phillip --- Dr. Phillip Lougher Author and Maintainer of Squashfs ___ Lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC PATCH] tools/squashfs: change to upstream and update to new version 5.0-rc1

2017-05-28 Thread Phillip Lougher
t hasn't been on my priority list. Phillip > > Best Regards, > Syrone Wong > > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Phillip Lougher > wrote: >> On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote: >>> squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major &

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC PATCH] tools/squashfs: change to upstream and update to new version 5.0-rc1

2017-05-28 Thread Phillip Lougher
tability patches have been rejected by me. In both cases their lack of integration does not mean the project is not maintained. Do not make untrue claims. Cheers Dr. Phillip Lougher Author and Maintainer of Squashfs. ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-de