On Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2018 05:29:01 CEST Dongming Han wrote:
> We actually allocate two MAC per GL-AR750. In manufacturing procedure, every
> scan of device label consumes two MAC in database.
Thanks for the fast reply.
> Is there any pitfall not having unique MAC per interface on some use case?
Ich bin vom 7. bis 18. Mai im Urlaub und werde nur gelegentlich Zugang zu
meinem Postfach haben. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an
i...@shoutrlabs.com.
I'm on vacation from 7 to 18 May and will only occasionally have access to my
mailbox. In urgent cases, please contact i...@shoutrl
Hi Sven,
We actually allocate two MAC per GL-AR750. In manufacturing procedure, every
scan of device label consumes two MAC in database.
Is there any pitfall not having unique MAC per interface on some use case?
Many thanks for your advice.
--
Best Regards,
Dongming Han
> I've just noticed that
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Tested-by: Michael Yartys
Tar
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Refresh patches.
Tested-on: ar71x
Hi,
I've just noticed that the mac addresses for this device aren't unique (on the
device itself). Neither in the original firmware or in the OpenWrt/LEDE
support.
2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether e4:95:6e:44:09:58 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: wlan1: mtu 1500 qdisc
4.14.40 released.
Best Regards,
Syrone Wong
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Stijn Segers wrote:
> Op di, 8 mei 2018 om 6:42 , schreef Koen Vandeputte
> :
>>
>> Refreshed all patches
>>
>> Dropped upstreamed patches:
>> 522-PCI-aardvark-fix-logic-in-PCI-configuration-read-write-functions.patch
Hi,
the mentioned PR included a few new packages. I don't know the layerscape
platform, so I just want to understand it: these packages are all
necessary to
boot a "reasonable"
system? And this is true for fmc, too?
[Y.b. Lu] fmc is an important userspace tool for layerscape which is
freq
On 05/08/2018 10:33 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>
>
>> On 8 May 2018, at 21:11, Rosen Penev wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So out of curiosity I built this for my Archer C7 v2 ar71xx device. I also
>>> modified the code to not give up on ‘OK’, so it always iterated 10 times.
>>> I then ran this re
It seems that after the commit that added gtime as host dependency the
buildbot failed to compile this target
https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/faillogs/aarch64_cortex-a53/
and all logs state that it is missing "gtime". I suppose that this will
block compilation of any other target, even
The set_helper field has to be set by set_helper and not helper.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Lebleu
---
rules.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules.c b/rules.c
index ea66771..f6b6044 100644
--- a/rules.c
+++ b/rules.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ const struct fw3_option fw3_
Hi Michael,
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Heimpold [mailto:m...@heimpold.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 2:41 AM
> To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org; Xiaobo Xie
> Cc: Y.b. Lu ; openwrt-de...@lists.openwrt.org; Hauke
> Mehrtens ; John Crispin
> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Layerscape
12 matches
Mail list logo
