Re: [LEDE-DEV] OpenWrt LEDE merge

2018-01-04 Thread Vincenzo Romano
Live long, OpenWRT/LEDE! 2018-01-05 7:49 GMT+01:00 Levente : > I'm happy to see the unified project. > > I cloned the source code, and it is working fine, however I noticed > that some parts are still pulled from the LEDE git server. Is this > intentional? Will all parts moved to OpenWrt's reposit

Re: [LEDE-DEV] OpenWrt LEDE merge

2018-01-04 Thread Levente
I'm happy to see the unified project. I cloned the source code, and it is working fine, however I noticed that some parts are still pulled from the LEDE git server. Is this intentional? Will all parts moved to OpenWrt's repository? Thanks, Levente On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Hauke Mehrte

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] layerscape: activate fpu feature

2018-01-04 Thread Y.b. Lu
Hi Hauke, > -Original Message- > From: Hauke Mehrtens [mailto:ha...@hauke-m.de] > Sent: 2018年1月4日 4:47 > To: Y.b. Lu ; lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] layerscape: activate fpu feature > > On 01/03/2018 04:21 AM, Y.b. Lu wrote: > > Hi Hauke, > > > > The layerscape main

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: build RTC kmods when RTC_SUPPORT is activated

2018-01-04 Thread Valent Turkovic
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-07-08 11:04, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> The build bots are not setting CONFIG_ALL any more, so activate this >> module by default why any of the ALL* options is selected. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens > I think it would be more u

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1 1/1] uboot-at91: fix build after fpu activation

2018-01-04 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 01/04/2018 08:43 PM, Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun wrote: > neon and VFPv4 support is added to this target and uboot-at91 build > fails due to TARGET_CFLAGS -mfloat-abi set to hard. as a fix, setting > uboot-at91 CFLAGS -mfloat-abi=soft. > > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun > > ---

[LEDE-DEV] OpenWrt LEDE merge

2018-01-04 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
The OpenWrt and the LEDE project are happily announcing the unification of both projects under the OpenWrt name. After long and sometimes slowly moving discussions about the specifics of the re-merge, with multiple similar proposals but little subsequent action, we're happy to announce that both p

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/1] at91: kernel configuration

2018-01-04 Thread Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun
1. enabled DMA controller options 2. Enabled CMA options 3. enabled VFP options 4. Add Atmel SD/MMC Driver Signed-off-by: Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun --- target/linux/at91/sama5/config-default | 43 ++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/linux/

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] busybox: clean up patch fuzz

2018-01-04 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Refresh patches to tidy up fuzz. No functional changes Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant --- .../utils/busybox/patches/500-move-traceroute-applets-to-bin.patch | 4 ++-- package/utils/busybox/patches/600-cve-2017-16544.patch | 7 +-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 dele

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] lua: clean up patch fuzz

2018-01-04 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Refresh patches to tidy up fuzz. No functional changes Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant --- .../patches/010-lua-5.1.3-lnum-full-260308.patch | 47 +++--- .../012-lnum-fix-ltle-relational-operators.patch | 4 +- package/utils/lua/patches/020-shared_liblua.patch | 2 +

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/1] at91bootstrap: at91bootstrap default selection

2018-01-04 Thread Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun
The fixes following problems 1. changing prefix at91bootstrap to AT91bootstrap will fix the default selection of at91bootstrap for the selected sama5 subtarget. 2. fixed missing default selection of sama5d4 nand flash for the selected sama5d4 subtarget. 3. corrected at91bootstrap Title name.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] at91: sama5: activate fpu

2018-01-04 Thread Sandeep Sheriker
Hi Hauke, I have fixed this in bit different way and verified it on sama5 devices. submitted the patch and below the patch link for your reference. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/855787/ Regards, Sandeep Sheriker M On 01/03/2018 04:18 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 01/02/2018 07:26 PM, S

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1 1/1] uboot-at91: fix build after fpu activation

2018-01-04 Thread Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun
neon and VFPv4 support is added to this target and uboot-at91 build fails due to TARGET_CFLAGS -mfloat-abi set to hard. as a fix, setting uboot-at91 CFLAGS -mfloat-abi=soft. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun --- package/boot/uboot-at91/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] imx6: fix pcie scanning on boot

2018-01-04 Thread Koen Vandeputte
By default, when the imx6 PCIe RC boots up, the subordinate is set equally to the secondary bus (1), and does not alter afterwards. This means that theoretically, the highest bus reachable downstream is bus 1. Before upstream commit a20c7f36bd3d ("PCI: Do not allocate more buses than available in

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] libfstools: support file paths longer than 255 chars

2018-01-04 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki Alloc globdir buffer dynamically and simply use realloc when needed. This fixes e.g. segmentation fault in jffs2reset due to an infinite recurrency when dealing with longs paths. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- libfstools/overlay.c | 21 + 1 file change

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] argp-standalone: clean up patch fuzz

2018-01-04 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Refresh patches to tidy up fuzz. No functional changes Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant --- .../argp-standalone/patches/001-throw-in-funcdef.patch | 16 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/package/libs/argp-standalone/patches/001-throw-in-funcd

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] imx6: fix pcie scanning on boot

2018-01-04 Thread Koen Vandeputte
Some additional info on this: The issue is caused by the imx6 PCIe Root Complex which is not properly configured on boot. The subordinate should be set to 0xff (maximum bus nr that is reachable downstream) lspci -v: [ Node 3 | node-3 ] lspci -v 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Synopsys, Inc. Device abcd

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: Restore respawn on SIGTERM timeout

2018-01-04 Thread John Crispin
On 04/01/18 13:17, Kristian Evensen wrote: On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Kristian Evensen wrote: When SIGTERM times out, procd sends SIGKILL and then restarts the process once SIGCHLD has been received. This all works fine, with one exception - respawn is not restored when instance_start()

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH odhcpd v2] Support muliple RAs on single interface

2018-01-04 Thread Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
Hello Hans, Thanks for committing ! In the multi-homing case, you would typically have two RAs on the same interface with one PIO per RA. Therefore you would define two software interfaces, each with a prefix-filter option making sure a single prefix is included in each RA. So I think it would w

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH odhcpd v2] Support muliple RAs on single interface

2018-01-04 Thread Hans Dedecker
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) wrote: > Hello Hans and happy new year ! > > As requested in your comment to v1, I have updated the README file. > Would you mind reviewing this new version of the patch ? > > Thanks, > > - Pierre Hi Pierre, Also a happy new year! I've re

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: Restore respawn on SIGTERM timeout

2018-01-04 Thread Kristian Evensen
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Kristian Evensen wrote: > When SIGTERM times out, procd sends SIGKILL and then restarts the > process once SIGCHLD has been received. This all works fine, with one > exception - respawn is not restored when instance_start() is called from > instance_exit(). The rea

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH odhcpd v2] Support muliple RAs on single interface

2018-01-04 Thread Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
Hello Hans and happy new year ! As requested in your comment to v1, I have updated the README file. Would you mind reviewing this new version of the patch ? Thanks, - Pierre > Le 8 déc. 2017 à 15:15, ppfis...@cisco.com a écrit : > > From: Pierre Pfister > > IETF is moving toward implementing

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH netifd] proto: allow dumping protocol handlers without config_params

2018-01-04 Thread Hans Dedecker
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Olof Sivertsson wrote: > Hi Hans, > >> >> I'm unable to reproduce the reported netifd crash by using a proto >> shell handler having no proto_init_config function. >> Looking into the code the proto_handler config_params parameter is >> always assigned the proto she