Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] layerscape: activate fpu feature

2018-01-02 Thread Y.b. Lu
Hi Hauke, The layerscape maintainer info should be no problem. You just sent wrong email address to me. (cyangbo...@nxp.com) MAINTAINER:=Yangbo Lu I will cherry-pick this patch to our internal LEDE git tree. Test team will test all devices, and we will have a release on our github by end of Ja

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] kernel: bump 4.9 to 4.9.74

2018-01-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Refresh patches Tested-on: ar71xx Archer C7 v2 Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant --- include/kernel-version.mk| 4 ++-- ...sb-xhci-add-firmware-loader-for-uPD720201-and-uPD72.patch | 6 +++--- .../patches-4.9/802-usb-xhci-force-msi-renesas-xhci.patch

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] odhcp6c: Replace strerror(errno) with %m

2018-01-02 Thread Rosen Penev
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Le 12/25/17 à 15:05, Rosen Penev a écrit : >> Reduction of 48 bytes in compiled size. No functional difference. >> >> -pedantic was removed as %m is a GNU extension. > > My 2 cents, I really think your patches are moving us in the wrong >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] luci: treewide: Replace strerror(errno) with %m.

2018-01-02 Thread Rosen Penev
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Karl Palsson wrote: > > Rosen Penev wrote: >> Saves a few bytes. No functional difference. > > Except that it now requires gnu extensions to compile. That seems > like a pretty poor tradeoff. > BSDs such as FreeBSD and macOS print only m when %m is specified. Tha

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] at91: sama5: activate fpu

2018-01-02 Thread Sandeep Sheriker
Hi Hauke, I get below build error make  -C /home/sandeep/microchip/arm/lede/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a5+neon-vfpv4_musl_eabi/u-boot-sama5d2_xplained_mmc/u-boot-2016.05 sama5d2_xplained_mmc_config make[4]: Entering directory '/home/sandeep/microchip/arm/lede/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a5+n

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 1/1] at91: create sdcard image for sama5

2018-01-02 Thread SandeepSheriker.Mallikarjun
Hi Hauke, I am not able to reproduce this error from my end. 1. Is it possible to share me the config files of the failed build? 2. If this is a random problem with the build bot, Then what is the status this patch ? Regards, Sandeep Sheriker > -Original Message- > From: Hauke Mehr

[LEDE-DEV] OpenWrt source replaced by former LEDE tree

2018-01-02 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, following the agreed OpenWrt/LEDE re-merge procedure, we've replaced the OpenWrt Git tree with the LEDE Git tree now and archived the old repository. If you're working with older branches such as Chaos Calmer or Barrier Breaker, you do have to update your remotes in order to continue to be ab

[LEDE-DEV] Merged: procd: procd_send_signal use signal names

2018-01-02 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Merged into my staging tree with http://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/jow/staging.git;a=commitdiff;h=df5303c92a. Thank you! ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: use SIGUSR2 for dnssec time valid

2018-01-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Move 'check dnssec timestamp enable' from SIGHUP handler to SIGUSR2. Dnsmasq uses SIGHUP to do too many things: 1) set dnssec time validation enabled, 2) bump SOA zone serial, 3) clear dns cache, 4) reload hosts files, 5) reload resolvers/servers files. SIGUSR2 is used to re-open/re-start the log

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1] procd: procd_send_signal use signal names

2018-01-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Usage documentation for 'procd_send_signal' states "The signal is SIGHUP by default, and must be specified by NAME." Make actual behaviour match the stated documented behaviour. https://wiki.openwrt.org/inbox/procd-init-scripts Suggested-by: Jo-Philip Wich Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant