On 12/11/2017 07:10 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
[..]
> Do you think it would be worth the effort to unify the cryptography
> libraries in LEDE?
This sounds like a huge task.
Maybe you can extend a program so it supports a different crypto library that
is also used in the LEDE/OpenWRT ecosys
Citeren Jonas Gorski :
On 11 December 2017 at 10:04, Rosen Penev wrote:
Mainly plugging memory leaks. Size reduction as well. The calloc
change accounts for 272 bytes on this machine for some reason...
Please state the exact errors found by cppcheck so we don't have to
guess what it found.
11.12.2017 20:37, txt.file:
Didn't you want to use 'us' as image identifier? In your patch it is
still north america just shortened to 2 letters.
kind regards
txt.file
Please don't top-post.
The way it was done is correct. North america != us. I fixed the commit
message before I merged the p
Didn't you want to use 'us' as image identifier? In your patch it is
still north america just shortened to 2 letters.
kind regards
txt.file
Moritz Warning:
> Replace 'north-america' by 'us' and remove 'other-regions' in image files for
> Netgear WGR614 v10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
>
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> We could unify all packages to use a single cryptography library, for
> example LibreSSL or mbed TLS. We could save some space, effort for
For some narrow things they are slightly interchangeable, but for many things
you want one of these to avoid the bloa
Recently I did a sysupgrade on an older OpenWRT system and upgraded it
to LEDE. I had the problem that there was no dnsmasq user because
/etc/passwd is in /lib/upgrade/keep.d/base-files-essential and
sysupgrade does not merge them. I thought a bit about how to improve this.
There is a NSS module c
Packages use several cryptography libraries because different packages
require different libraries. hostapd uses OpenSSL, dnsmasq Nettle and
ustream-ssl can use multiple libraries for example. In itself this is
also not a major problem.
We could unify all packages to use a single cryptography libr
On 11 December 2017 at 10:04, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Mainly plugging memory leaks. Size reduction as well. The calloc change
> accounts for 272 bytes on this machine for some reason...
Please state the exact errors found by cppcheck so we don't have to
guess what it found.
Regards
Jonas
___
Mainly plugging memory leaks. Size reduction as well. The calloc change
accounts for 272 bytes on this machine for some reason...
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev
v2: Add calloc fail check + turn some functions to void where it saves size.
Total savings = 184 bytes after everything.
---
block.c
