Re: [LEDE-DEV] Info und Aktuelles für hiccups.eu

2017-10-19 Thread Günter Huber
Guten Tag geehrte Frau / Herr, Es ist amtlich das der Domain Name hiccups.eu für Sie zur möglichen Abgabe steht. Würden Sie mir bitte eine kurze Rückmeldung geben ob wir Ihre Interesse geweckt haben? Ich wünsche Ihnen ein schönes Wochenende und verbleibe. Günter Huber ___

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] musl: update to 1.1.17

2017-10-19 Thread Christian Lamparter
This patch updates musl to the latest 1.1.17 release. Rick Felker stated in his release note: " This release fixes numerous bugs affecting visible behavior and safety/internal consistency, including a stack-based buffer overflow in dns parsing and multiple sources of invalid memory accesses that m

Re: [LEDE-DEV] revisited: Nanostation m5 XW ethernet patch gone

2017-10-19 Thread Joe Ayers
Was the fix included in the Generic PHY? If not, possible some of the following are still using the generic and therefore would still have the bug?: NBE/PBE-M5-300 XW: ag71xx ag71xx.0: connected to PHY at ag71xx-mdio.0:01 [uid=004dd023, driver=Generic PHY] NSM5-loco-XW: ag71xx ag71xx.0: connecte

Re: [LEDE-DEV] meetup for beer in Prague

2017-10-19 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 10/18/2017 08:58 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Hi, > > We have ELCE and the OpenWrt summit next week in Prague and a lot of > people will be there. > > I would like to have a meeting next Wednesday evening 25. October 2017 > in Prague, like we did it last year at c-base: > http://lists.infradead

Re: [LEDE-DEV] revisited: Nanostation m5 XW ethernet patch gone

2017-10-19 Thread Felix Fietkau
Hi Daniel, The patch that you mentioned is not related to your issue at all, since it only deals with the AT8032 PHY, which the NanoStation M does not have. Maybe you can provide a more detailed description of what symptoms you're seeing. I did indeed clean up the AT8032 mess and solved it in the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] test at91 target with kernel 4.9

2017-10-19 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
Hi, HTML mails are rejected by the mailing list, please post in plain text next time. On 10/19/2017 02:00 AM, sandeepsheriker.mallikar...@microchip.com wrote: > Hi Hauke, > >   With respect to adding kernel 4.9 support and below are the steps I > fallowed to build and get some error's > > 1.   

[LEDE-DEV] revisited: Nanostation m5 XW ethernet patch gone

2017-10-19 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Felix! Hi everyone! It looks like Tiziano is right and this patch did get lost somehow. At least I can't find any work-arounds regarding PHY hangs committed in neither target/linux/generic/files/* nor target/linux/ar71xx/files/*. The thread on lede-dev also seems to have stagnated after http:/

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: Restore respawn on SIGTERM timeout

2017-10-19 Thread Karl Palsson
Kristian Evensen wrote: > When SIGTERM times out, procd sends SIGKILL and then restarts > the process once SIGCHLD has been received. This all works > fine, with one exception - respawn is not restored when > instance_start() is called from instance_exit(). The reason is > that respawn is always

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ubox logread

2017-10-19 Thread Maksym Ruchko
The read optimization with buffer ustream in the logread caused the logger to hung randomly, more often under high load and when logged messages are large. To reproduce 100% compile and run: #include #include #include #define BUF_SIZE 8192 int i; static char msg_buf[BUF_SIZE]; int main(int

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] hostapd: remove default r1_key_holder generation

2017-10-19 Thread Yury Shvedov
By default, hostapd assumes r1_key_holder equal to bssid. If LEDE configures the same static r1 key holder ID on two different APs (BSSes) the RRB exchanges fails behind them. Signed-off-by: Yury Shvedov --- package/network/services/hostapd/files/hostapd.sh | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] hostapd: remove default r1_key_holder generation

2017-10-19 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2017-10-19 15:48, Yury Shvedov wrote: > By default, hostapd assumes r1_key_holder equal to bssid. If LEDE > configures the same static r1 key holder ID on two different APs (BSSes) the > RRB exchanges fails behind them.Your patch is missing the Signed-off-by tag. > Please fix and resubmit. Tha

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for Ubiquiti Litebeam M5

2017-10-19 Thread Arne Zachlod
Specification: - SoC: Atheros AR9342 - Flash: 8 MiB - RAM: 64 MiB - UART: 1x UART on PCB - 115200 8N1 - Ethernet: 1 x 100 Mbit with passive PoE (24V/0.2A) Doesn't work: * Flash via TFTP with Uiquiti Uboot Installation via vendor firmware: - upload factory image via webinterface Signed-off-by: Ar

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] hostapd: remove default r1_key_holder generation

2017-10-19 Thread Yury Shvedov
By default, hostapd assumes r1_key_holder equal to bssid. If LEDE configures the same static r1 key holder ID on two different APs (BSSes) the RRB exchanges fails behind them. --- package/network/services/hostapd/files/hostapd.sh | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: Restore respawn on SIGTERM timeout

2017-10-19 Thread Kristian Evensen
When SIGTERM times out, procd sends SIGKILL and then restarts the process once SIGCHLD has been received. This all works fine, with one exception - respawn is not restored when instance_start() is called from instance_exit(). The reason is that respawn is always set to false in instance_stop(), and

Re: [LEDE-DEV] test at91 target with kernel 4.9

2017-10-19 Thread Ben Whitten
Hi Sandeep, > 4. make kernel_menuconfig CONFIG_TARGET=at91. Changed few things below > and attached update config-4.9 file. > > A. enabled CONFIG_SOC_SAM_V7=y > > B. enabled CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5=y, CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D2=y, > CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D3=y and CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D4=y I think you ar