Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] MV88E6060 switch

2017-10-10 Thread Sergey Ryazanov
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 01:31:29 +0300 Sergey Ryazanov > wrote: > >> > Just tried: >> > # ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.10 up >> > ifconfig: SIOCSIFFLAGS: Out of memory >> > # dmesg|grep eth >> > [0.998445] eth0: MII PHY 32 on NPE-B >> > [1.

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] mac80211: Add patch to re-enable setting a single rate.

2017-10-10 Thread greearb
From: Ben Greear This lets one use 'iw' to set individual rates on ath10k again. Signed-off-by: Ben Greear --- .../111-mac80211_allow_single_tx_rate_again.patch | 33 ++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/kernel/mac80211/patches/111-mac80211_allo

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] firmware-utils: mktplinkfw: fix JFFS2 EOF markers

2017-10-10 Thread Sergey Ryazanov
mktplinkfw/mktplinkfw2 utilities put JFFS2 EOF market only at 64KB boundary, this could lead to current device configuration lost during the sysupgrade on a device, which is equpped with flash with the 4KB erase block size (e.g. TP-Link Archer C20). This happens when 64KB and 4KB alignments do not

[LEDE-DEV] openwrt/packages

2017-10-10 Thread Val Kulkov
What is the most appropriate forum for discussing issues related to the community management of openwrt/packages? Unless I am missing something, there is no forum, no wiki nor any other place for discussing openwrt/packages other than the "Issues" section at Github which is dedicated to discussing

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] brcm47xx: relocate the stack in loader

2017-10-10 Thread p . wassi
> (...) Relocate it to a different memory region which is > still under the 8MB RAM, but in the higher area. Ok, I can confirm that this is working fine with both, the WRT54GL and the WL500GP V2 on Linux 4.9.52. Thanks for debugging and fixing! Regards, P. Wassi _

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 0/4] ar71xx: add support for kernel 4.9

2017-10-10 Thread Sven Schönhoff
Hi Hauke, I've tested kernel 4.9 with my TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v1 and everything seems to work so far. The only thing I've noticed is that internet speedtests with the build from your ar71xx staging tree are slower (~130Mbit) in comparison to the 17.01.3 release with kernel 4.4 (~197Mbit). Thank

Re: [LEDE-DEV] iptables broken x86 ?

2017-10-10 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 10/10/2017 02:41 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: > On 10.10.2017 05:26, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Le 10/09/17 à 11:01, Lucian Cristian a écrit : >>> I'm trying to make a custom image and can't seem to get pass by this >> You would have to provide a more complete log, here we just see the make >> ret

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 0/4] ar71xx: add support for kernel 4.9

2017-10-10 Thread Andrey Jr. Melnikov
Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 10/09/2017 01:28 PM, Andrey Jr. Melnikov wrote: > > Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > >> On 10/08/2017 01:31 PM, Andrey Jr. Melnikov wrote: > >>> Arjen de Korte wrote: > Citeren Hauke Mehrtens : [] > > USB working, ethernet working, SFP not working. > Hi, > Was SFP

Re: [LEDE-DEV] iptables broken x86 ?

2017-10-10 Thread Lucian Cristian
On 10.10.2017 05:26, Florian Fainelli wrote: Le 10/09/17 à 11:01, Lucian Cristian a écrit : I'm trying to make a custom image and can't seem to get pass by this You would have to provide a more complete log, here we just see the make returning an error back from the directories it descended int

Re: [LEDE-DEV] iptables broken x86 ?

2017-10-10 Thread Lucian Cristian
On 10.10.2017 05:26, Florian Fainelli wrote: Le 10/09/17 à 11:01, Lucian Cristian a écrit : I'm trying to make a custom image and can't seem to get pass by this You would have to provide a more complete log, here we just see the make returning an error back from the directories it descended int