> On May 25, 2017, at 10:59 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote:
>
> On 24.05.2017 23:34, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to start preparing the v17.01.2 release during the upcoming
>> weekend with the goal to release final binaries within the next week
>> (~May 29th till June 3rd).
>>
>> C
Can we add “Powered by LEDE” in little tiny letters underneath? ;-)
> On May 29, 2017, at 4:11 AM, Jamie Stuart wrote:
>
> Hi,
> First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
> moving forward.
> For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘le
Dnia 2017-05-24, o godz. 22:34:20
Jo-Philipp Wich napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start preparing the v17.01.2 release during the upcoming
> weekend with the goal to release final binaries within the next week
> (~May 29th till June 3rd).
>
> Changes that shall be part of 17.01.2 should be me
Carlos-
I don't think it matters what it's called to the OpenWrt/LEDE community
- we have exhibited, shall we say, remarkable flexibility in the last
few years, I think... ;-)
And, in fairness, I don't disagree with you - I think OpenWrt is a
terrible name, one we would never choose if we we
Thank you for your replies. Turns out the problem was the ground
connection, and serial nowworks with pl2303. Unfortunately I mixed up
2 addresses when flashing the new firmware, and erased from 0x9f00
on instead of 0x9f02. As a result, my boot loader is corrupt. Now
I'm trying some last re
Hi Carlos,
the Wrt in OpenWrt comes from the Linksys WRT54G(L) which was the first
supported device. WRT devices from Linkys still exist however they aren't
that relevant anymore.
Maybe we can find a good backronym for Wrt/WRT which describes the current
state of the project better. My first thou
@Mirko and @Bill
I had the same thoughts in the past. OpenWRt has evolved into a much
more diverse and generic embedded development environment.
It no longer serves only the Wireless community interests or used just
in Wireless Routers. It goes much beyond that.
Also, in my opinion, LEDE would b