Hello,
The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork:
* lede: [LEDE-DEV] musl: update musl to 1.1.16 and switch to download from git
- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/710318/
- for: LEDE development
was: New
now: Superseded
This email is a notification
On 1/2/2017 12:22 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 06:52:32 -0800
Dana Myers wrote:
On 12/29/2016 11:50 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
Another alternative to hotspot on mips would be cacao, again with
openjdk classpath. Though jamvm certainly is a vaild pick.
Without revisiti
Thx
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> 1) In a topology like this:
>>
>> ISP
>> |
>> routerA
>> |
>> routerB
>> |
>> routerC
>>
>> what options now exist in lede for getting an ipv6 subnet to routerC
>> from routerA after
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
From: Christian Lamparter
This p
Hey everyone,
Currently known remaining users of polarssl are:
* bmx7
* pianod
* shadowsocks-libev-polarssl
* shairport-sync-mini
* shairport-sync-polarssl
* transmission-cli-polarssl
* transmission-daemon-polarssl
* transmission-remote-polarssl
* umurmur-polarssl
Please provide feed
Hi,
2017-01-03 4:22 GMT-08:00 Jo-Philipp Wich :
> Hi list,
>
> the mbed TLS project (formerly known as PolarSSL) declared the mbedTLS
> 1.3 branch (packaged as "libpolarssl" by LEDE) to be EOL with the end of
> the year 2016. [1]
>
> In order to avoid shipping an outdated and possibly vulnerable S
From: Rafał Miłecki
Sometimes txpower is not set so we should have an option with empty
value to let it stay unset.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
.../luci-mod-admin-full/luasrc/model/cbi/admin_network/wifi.lua| 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/mo
On 3.1.2017 14:22, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Right now there are more or less two approaches proposed:
a) Keep libpolarssl available for the initial 17.01.0 release and drop
it with the first maintenance release 17.01.1 about 6-8 weeks later
b) Drop libpolarssl now, even before branching and u
The odhcpd documentation currently implies that "option ignore 1" in a section
of type "dhcp" will disable any services on the referenced interface while the
code actually ignores the setting when initializing referenced interfaces.
This commonly leads to situations where users think that "option
On 2017-01-03 12:03, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> To achieve this, we remove the uboot-sunxi package and build it on our
> own so that we do not need to enumerate every uboot variants in the
> package set of the default profile.
>
> Then the default package set was generated by sort | uniq all current
>
Hi,
I'm in favor of dropping it, don't see anything good in keeping outdated
and unsupported libraries.
As far as package status goes...
shadowsocks-libev --> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/3729 +
https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/657
pianod + shairport-sync* -->
https:/
Jo-Philipp Wich writes:
> Hi list,
>
> the mbed TLS project (formerly known as PolarSSL) declared the mbedTLS
> 1.3 branch (packaged as "libpolarssl" by LEDE) to be EOL with the end of
> the year 2016. [1]
>
> In order to avoid shipping an outdated and possibly vulnerable SSL
> library with the f
Hi list,
the mbed TLS project (formerly known as PolarSSL) declared the mbedTLS
1.3 branch (packaged as "libpolarssl" by LEDE) to be EOL with the end of
the year 2016. [1]
In order to avoid shipping an outdated and possibly vulnerable SSL
library with the first LEDE release we begun migrating cor
On 2017-01-03 10:25, Hannu Nyman wrote:
On 3.1.2017 0:22, Christian Lamparter wrote:
This patch updates musl to 1.1.16 [0] and removes all the
backported patches.
...
delete mode 100644
toolchain/musl/patches/099-Add-format-attribute-to-some-function-declarations.patch
Like I commened o
On 01/03/2017 09:37 AM, Eric Masson wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki writes:
>
> Hi Rafal,
>
>> I just downloaded and extracted
>> https://downloads.lede-project.org/snapshots/targets/brcm47xx/legacy/lede-imagebuilder-brcm47xx-legacy.Linux-x86_64.tar.xz
>>
>> I entered lede-imagebuilder-brcm47xx-legacy.Li
On 01/03/2017 02:02 AM, Nick Kamenyitzky wrote:
> Is there any reason that the sqm-scripts makefile has a git:// link
> instead of a https:// link? At my office git:// doesn't work but
> https:// does.
>
> Should this be something that is standardised or considered?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Nic
Two things that need to be noted
- There is no partition type id allocated for squashfs yet. In the
case of sunxi, any non-zero value should work and we keep it 83 (the
value for ext4)
- Remaining spare space within the rootfs partition, not the entire
sdcard space will be formated as
This series mainly tries achieve the following goals
- use new image generation method
- squashfs sdcard image support
- mkfs.f2fs or mkfs.ext4 remaining space within squashfs rootfs partition and
mount it as rw overlay
- sysupgrade with fwtool check support
Device profiles are automatical
The new Device/xxx were transformed automatically from old profiles.
Most device names are now taken from basename of the corresponding
kernel device tree file. Device/sun5i-a13-olimex-som is an exception
because it is not explicitly supported in the kernel yet and shares the
same dts file with D
To achieve this, device tree compatible string was used as boardname and
the value of it will be checked against supported_devices list.
It should be noted that we do not distinguish between
sun5i-a13-olimex-som and sun5i-a13-olinuxino as they share the same dts
file.
The other thing is that we n
Enalbe builtin support for FAT filesystem as we need to mount boot
partition to store sysupgrade.tgz there
Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
---
.../sunxi/base-files/lib/preinit/79_move_config| 20 +++
.../linux/sunxi/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 67 ++
target/linux
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> 1) In a topology like this:
>
> ISP
> |
> routerA
> |
> routerB
> |
> routerC
>
> what options now exist in lede for getting an ipv6 subnet to routerC
> from routerA after being provided by the ISP? (the basic PD allocation
> from ISP to A seem
On 3.1.2017 0:22, Christian Lamparter wrote:
This patch updates musl to 1.1.16 [0] and removes all the
backported patches.
...
delete mode 100644
toolchain/musl/patches/099-Add-format-attribute-to-some-function-declarations.patch
Like I commened on the Github PR 660 about the same version b
Looks OK.
Compile & run-tested on cns3xxx & imx6
Tested-by: Koen Vandeputte
On 2017-01-02 23:23, Christian Lamparter via Lede-dev wrote:
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this
Rafał Miłecki writes:
Hi Rafal,
> I just downloaded and extracted
> https://downloads.lede-project.org/snapshots/targets/brcm47xx/legacy/lede-imagebuilder-brcm47xx-legacy.Linux-x86_64.tar.xz
>
> I entered lede-imagebuilder-brcm47xx-legacy.Linux-x86_64 and executed your
> command. It worked fine
25 matches
Mail list logo
