On 21/12/2016 08:50, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I really like the idea.
> Are you thinking on applying this for generic patches only or also for target
> specific ones?
>
> Álvaro.
all patches/ folder whether generic, target or package are controlled by
the same code inside
Hi John,
I really like the idea.
Are you thinking on applying this for generic patches only or also for target
specific ones?
Álvaro.
El 20/12/16 a las 21:53, John Crispin escribió:
> Hi,
>
> i have been thinking of how to split up the kernel patches folder in a
> better way. for a start we ha
Hi,
i have been thinking of how to split up the kernel patches folder in a
better way. for a start we have all the backports inside the same folder
as our normal patches, unfortunately we have some backports and patches
that have in the meantime been sent upstream not numbered as 0xx-*.patch.
i w
Update to latest upstream HEAD:
- Refreshed all
- Fixes 2 regressions:
--> PeerKey: Fix STK 4-way handshake regression
--> PeerKey: Fix EAPOL-Key processing
Compile tested Full & Mini configs
Run-tested Mini config
Signed-off-by: Koen Vandeputte
---
package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile
14.12.2016 18:41, FUKAUMI Naoki:
only DHP-EU and DHP2-JP (fw ver. 2.x) images are built for now.
it seems DHP-JP/AP/TW (fw ver. 1.x) use different buffalo_csum() formula,
so this may not work for them. (not confirmed)
Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki
---
target/linux/bcm53xx/image/Makefile | 32 +
