On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi Bastian,
the usual approach is the following:
- Install "buildbot-slave", on Debian/Ubuntu this is as easy as running
"apt-get install buildbot-slave"
- Install remaining packages required for build, I attached the package
list exported from one
All,
I was hoping the meeting attendees, and the community, could provide
some feedback about the agenda of the in-person OpenWrt & TR-069
Meeting. I've created an initial agenda but I'm sure I've missed things
or topics we need to discuss. If you'd like to provide feedback
(especially if you're
On 24/06/2016 16:39, Drew from NixCore wrote:
> The NixCore X1 is a Ralink/MediaTek rt5350 WiFi Module
>
> Patch submission with assistance from LD Pinney, using
> simplier email client.
>
> Signed-off-by: L. D. Pinney
> Signed-off-by: Drew Gaylo
Your email client has replaced all tabs with
The NixCore X1 is a Ralink/MediaTek rt5350 WiFi Module
Patch submission with assistance from LD Pinney, using
simplier email client.
Signed-off-by: L. D. Pinney
Signed-off-by: Drew Gaylo
---
target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 1 +
target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.
Hi Bastian,
the usual approach is the following:
- Install "buildbot-slave", on Debian/Ubuntu this is as easy as running
"apt-get install buildbot-slave"
- Install remaining packages required for build, I attached the package
list exported from one of our slaves
- Setup a slave and point it t
Hi Alin,
is there some upstream reference we can refer to? Did you submit it
there as well?
Regards,
Jo
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
There are 2 issues fixed by this patch:
- UDP checksum is computed incorrectly, the used pseudo IP header
contains transport protocol 6 iso 17
- on big endian arches the UDP/TCP checksum is incorrectly
computed when payload length is odd
Signed-off-by: Alin Nastac
---
.../patches/100
* Jo-Philipp Wich [24.06.2016 13:55]:
> please tell me if funding becomes problematic, we can always take the
> builder offline and continue with the remaining resources.
>
> Maybe you could also ask the OpenWrt folks whether all Google builders
> are still needed there, given the fact that the b
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> please tell me if funding becomes problematic, we can always take the
> builder offline and continue with the remaining resources.
>
> Maybe you could also ask the OpenWrt folks whether all Google builders
> are still needed th
Hi Dave,
please tell me if funding becomes problematic, we can always take the
builder offline and continue with the remaining resources.
Maybe you could also ask the OpenWrt folks whether all Google builders
are still needed there, given the fact that the builder is recompiling
the same very git
10 matches
Mail list logo